Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Trump, convicted of 34 felonies, released unconditionally, to return to White House while appealing.
{Current column}4344People have watched
IntroductionOn January 10, local time, New York State Supreme Court Judge Juan Merchan ruled on Trump's &qu ...

On January 10, local time, New York State Supreme Court Judge Juan Merchan ruled on Trump's "hush money" case, finding him guilty on 34 criminal charges but granted him unconditional release. This decision allows Trump to continue participating in the presidential transition process and to be sworn in as president with a felony record on January 20.
Why unconditional release?
The case originated in March 2023, when the Manhattan district attorney accused Trump of paying $130,000 to an adult film actress during the 2016 U.S. presidential election to buy her silence, falsifying business records, and violating New York State law. In May 2024, the jury found Trump guilty, but due to his candidacy and successful election as president, the court postponed sentencing.
Trump's legal team cited Supreme Court rulings on presidential immunity to attempt to overturn the conviction, but the New York state judge ruled the case involved Trump's personal actions, not official acts pertaining to his presidency, making immunity inapplicable. Ultimately, Judge Merchan decided that an unconditional release would best balance the interests of all parties, considering the importance of the presidential transition and other practical factors. This means Trump will retain a felony record but won't face imprisonment, fines, or probation.
Trump's reaction and appeal plan
Trump participated in the hearing via video, maintaining his innocence and calling the case a "political witch hunt." He later stated on social media that the verdict was a "disgrace" and a "hoax," announcing plans to appeal. Outside the court, Trump's supporters and opponents gathered to express their views.
Potential impact of the verdict
The verdict does not directly affect Trump's legal standing to serve as president again. Under U.S. law, individuals convicted of felonies can still run for and hold the presidency. However, this ruling makes Trump the first president in history to assume office with a felony record. He will need to submit a DNA sample to the New York criminal database and may face entry restrictions in some countries, such as Canada, the UK, and Israel, which have strict entry rules for felons and might require special permission for Trump to visit.
Additionally, since the ruling comes from a New York State court, and the president cannot pardon state court convictions, any future pardon request would need the approval of the Governor of New York. Given the current Democratic administration in New York, the likelihood of a pardon seems low.
Potential impact on governance
As Trump plans to appeal, the ongoing legal proceedings could divert his focus during his presidency. This case has garnered widespread public and international attention, potentially affecting Trump’s governance agenda and international reputation.
Nonetheless, Trump retains the rights to participate in elections and exercise presidential powers. His supporters argue that the verdict highlights injustices in the judicial system, whereas critics believe it shows the judiciary's concession to high-level politics. The future progression and impact of this case will remain the focus of public and media attention.

The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
U.S. CPI release: Can gold's correction shift? Market watches inflation.
{Current column}With the conclusion of the US presidential election, market attention towards the "Trump trade& ...
Read moreLucretradecenter has just added a $1,800 “liquidity management levy” to my withdrawal process.
{Current column}After nearly three weeks of back-and-forth, I thought I was finally going to receive my funds. My ac ...
Read moretdameritrades surprised me with a $2,000 “compliance validation fee”
{Current column}I had submitted my documents, received confirmation of approval, and even got an email saying my fun ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- OffizielleKryptoBorse blocked my $2,100 withdrawal
- NKVO claims I now have to pay a $1,600 “international remittance fee” to process my withdrawal.
- Eco Stock Trading informed me I must pay a $2,200 “global remittance tax”
- Belcher Investments Markets suddenly demanded a $2,000 “fund validation charge”
- Gold experiences volatility while waiting for CPI; Intraday gold trading analysis strategy.
- Magarebate now claims I need to pay a $2,000 “global account reconciliation fee”
Latest articles
-
Germany’s exports and output fell; Trump’s re
-
Xauxs Lites is now requesting a $1,750 “transaction unlocking fee”
-
Secured Meta Fx surprised me with a $2,300 “transactional risk review fee”
-
krypto Xperts Traders shocked me today by requesting a $1,750 “final processing levy”
-
Eminent Fx Trades required me a $2,050 “transaction approval fee”
-
Titan Macro is now forcing me to pay a $2,200 “final compliance adjustment” fee