Wheat demand rebounds, soybean exports face pressure; policies and competition are key.

CBOT Grain Market Experiences Volatility,Download the formal platform for buying ups and downs Speculative Funds Show Divergence

On Wednesday (November 27), the CBOT grain futures market faced pressure, but different commodities displayed divergent trends. Wheat prices rose, supported by a revival in demand and technical buying, while soybeans and corn remained under pressure due to international competition and uncertainty in U.S. trade policy. Analysts noted that global weather, geopolitical situations, and policy developments will dominate market direction in the future.

Wheat: Demand Recovery and Improved Weather Boost Prices

Recent improved planting conditions for U.S. winter wheat have increased the quality rating to 55%, far exceeding expectations. Rainfall in the Midwest further improved soil moisture, laying the foundation for future yields. Simultaneously, import demand has picked up, coupled with technical buying, pushing K.C. hard red winter wheat futures to $5.49 per bushel. Although a weaker dollar provided short-term price support, the market still needs to monitor changes in the Russia-Ukraine situation and fluctuations in global import demand for future impacts on transactions.

Soybeans: Export Competition and Policy Pressure Continue to Weigh Down

The soybean market remains under pressure, with CIF Gulf soybean basis quotes continuously declining, reflecting decreased export competitiveness. Favorable weather conditions in South America further exacerbate global supply pressures. Brazilian soybean prices remain consistently lower than those of the U.S., further impacting U.S. export challenges. Trump's tariff plans evoke concerns over reduced Chinese soybean demand, becoming a significant factor dragging down soybean prices. Analysts indicate that amid export pressures and policy uncertainties, soybean prices will struggle to escape downward pressure.

Soybean Oil and Meal: Policy Drives and Weak Demand Create Divergent Trends

Soybean oil showed resilience amid expected increases in biofuel demand, with an increase in speculative net long positions. In contrast, the soybean meal market experienced weak demand, with basis quotes slipping, indicating compressed processing plant profits. Speculative positions in the soybean meal market remained neutral, reflecting a market expectation split for short-term soybean oil and meal directions. In the future, soybean oil prices may be further driven by policies, while soybean meal will need to observe signals of a recovery in downstream livestock demand.

Corn: Weak Demand and Policy Risks Weigh on Performance

Corn futures have recently been pressured by poor export and demand outlooks, with the December contract falling to $4.28 per bushel. Trump's proposal to impose tariffs on Canada and Mexico heightened concerns over shrinking exports, particularly given Mexico's importance as a major U.S. corn buyer. Although logistical conditions have improved due to rising river levels, weak export markets and speculative funds increasing net short positions have kept market sentiment bearish.

Policies and Weather Dominate Market Trends

The CBOT grain market will face multiple challenges in the short term. Wheat prices may benefit from demand improvement and technical support, but intensified international competition and geopolitical changes will limit upside potential. Soybeans and corn remain pessimistic under export pressure and policy uncertainty. Soybean oil may rise further due to policy support, while soybean meal needs clear signs of demand recovery.

In the coming weeks, global weather changes, geopolitical situations, and trade policy dynamics will be crucial factors determining the overall direction of the CBOT grain market. Investors need to closely monitor the impact of these variables on market sentiment and price volatility.

The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.