Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Rising rent pressures low
{Current column}1People have watched
IntroductionThe latest study by the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW) shows that low-income household ...
The What are the regular platforms for domestic foreign exchange speculationlatest study by the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW) shows that low-income households in Germany are under increasing pressure due to rising rents, especially single-parent families and individuals living alone. These groups spend a much higher proportion of their income on rent compared to wealthy families, further exacerbating their financial burden. The data indicates that in 2021, the lowest 20% income group spent on average more than a third of their income on rent, while the wealthiest group spent only a fifth.
Over the past decade, rent prices across Germany have risen by 50%, with this increase reaching 70% in major cities. Despite the German government's goal to build 400,000 apartments annually to combat the housing shortage, the actual number of constructions falls short. In 2022, only 294,400 apartments were completed in Germany.
Additionally, the proportion of income spent on housing continues to rise, with the number of households spending more than 40% of their income on rent increasing from 5% to 14%. Nonetheless, demand for real estate has not declined despite rising interest rates and construction costs, and pressure on the rental market persists.
The Berlin city government implemented a rent cap policy in 2020, yet rents in the capital continue to climb, having increased by 40% over seven years. However, this policy has been deemed unconstitutional by Germany's highest court. The DIW study suggests providing targeted economic support for low-income groups and vigorously promoting social housing construction to alleviate the current rental market crisis.


The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
SQLQD has demanded me a $950 “security verification charge”
{Current column}This fee was never mentioned during registration or anywhere in their terms. Despite completing full ...
Read moreTrudeau denies Canada merging with the U.S., emphasizing mutual cooperation.
{Current column}According to reports from the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) and the British Broadcasting C ...
Read moreThe House Speaker deadlock may threaten Trump's path to office.
{Current column}January 2 - The deadlock in the election of the U.S. Speaker of the House continues to escalate, pot ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Trump's win may prompt the Fed to pause rate cuts, warns JPMorgan strategist.
- Trump revokes Biden's security clearance, stops intelligence briefings.
- Middle East ceasefire lifts gold, oil, and stocks as focus shifts to CPI and Fed policy.
- TikTok resumes U.S. services as Trump postpones ban, aiming for a long
- Prestige Capital Strategies forced me to pay a $980 “account clearance payment”
- Judge halts U.S. federal employee buyout program temporarily, with hearings set for February 10.
Latest articles
-
Oil giants fear Middle East conflict, expect rising demand, adding energy transition pressure.
-
LME approves Hong Kong for seven metal deliveries, impacting South China market.
-
Trump withdraws from Paris Agreement, vows to end Green New Deal and boost fossil fuels.
-
Trump was sworn in as the 47th U.S. President, outlining ambitious plans for territorial expansion.
-
FuryTrades asked a $500 “funds release surcharge” that was never disclosed before
-
Cybertruck explosion at Trump Hotel sparks police and Tesla investigation.