Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Court says EU must pay a fraction of legal fees sought by Qualcomm By Reuters
{Current column}13People have watched
IntroductionBy Foo Yun CheeBRUSSELS (Reuters) - Europe's second highest court has said EU regulators should pay ...
By Foo Yun Chee
BRUSSELS (Reuters) - Europe's second highest court has said EU regulators should pay 785,World's largest foreign exchange dealer rankings857.54 euros ($851,634) of legal fees for Qualcomm (NASDAQ:), less than 90% of the 12 million euros sought by the U.S. chipmaker after it won an appeal against an antitrust fine.

The Luxembourg-based General Court said the number of hours worked and hourly rates used in Qualcomm's claim was "manifestly excessive".
Qualcomm submitted its legal bill to the European Commission in 2022 after the General Court backed the U.S. group's fight against a 997 million euro EU antitrust fine issued in 2018 and ordered the regulator to pay Qualcomm's legal costs.
The Commission, however, disputed the 12,041,755.80 euros sought by the company, saying the amount should be 405,315 euros.
Qualcomm said its legal bill was based on the importance and complexity of the case and the quantity of work done by a team of 19.
Judges in a ruling dated Feb. 29 posted on the court's website dismissed the U.S. company's arguments, saying courts were concerned only with the total number of hours of work necessary for the legal proceedings, irrespective of the number of lawyers involved in the case.
They said hourly rates were not presented in relation to specific, clearly identified tasks and that the substantial amount of research and analysis and adduced numerous documents before the court was not sufficient to substantiate the sums claimed or that the work relating to them was necessarily incurred.
"The applicant's request is insufficiently substantiated and manifestly excessive as regards both the amounts claimed and the numbers of hours and related hourly rates," judges said.
The court set the total fee including expenses for law firm Quinn Emanuel at 754,190 euros and 31,667.54 euros for economic consultancy Compass Lexecon/FTI.
The case is T‑235/18 DEP Qualcomm vs European Commission.
($1 = 0.9228 euros)
Statement: The content of this article does not represent the views of FTI website. The content is for reference only and does not constitute investment suggestions. Investment is risky, so you should be careful in your choice! If it involves content, copyright and other issues, please contact us and we will make adjustments at the first time!
Tags:
Related articles
SpaceX rocket explosion illustrates Elon Musk's 'successful failure' formula By Reuters
{Current column}By Steve Gorman and Arlene EirasLOS ANGELES (Reuters) - The spectacular explosion of SpaceX's new St ...
Read moreHow is the regulation and safety of the SVSFX platform?
{Current column}Many friends who are new to the foreign exchange market feedback that it is difficult to find a reli ...
Read moreIs IEXS a legit or a scam? IEXS Review
{Current column}FTI's top 100 forex brokers you can refer to for selection. If it is not in the top 100, you sho ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Oil prices ease on caution over US debt ceiling talks By Reuters
- Is XM.com Broker safe? XM.com Review
- Is EFSG a legit or a scam? EFSG Review
- Is AMB PRIME a legit or a scam? AMB PRIME Review
- Asian stocks skittish after the Fed, Chinese markets reopen stronger By
- How is the regulation and safety of the OFM platform?
Latest articles
-
Serbian man confesses to killing eight in shooting rampage By Reuters
-
Exness点差放大致投资者账户爆仓!反馈无效无奈投诉维权!
-
Is GFS Markets a legit or a scam? GFS Markets Review
-
Is BP Prime a legit or a scam? BP Prime Review
-
Gold steady, copper slides as markets digest mixed CPI reading By
-
Is Tickmill a regular platform? Tickmill Evaluation