Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Trump suggests possibly deploying more U.S. troops to Greenland.
{Current column}8332People have watched
IntroductionMarch 13th - According to US media reports, on the 13th, US President Trump met with visiting NATO S ...

March 13th - According to US media reports, on the 13th, US President Trump met with visiting NATO Secretary-General Rutte at the White House and once again mentioned his territorial intentions towards Greenland, suggesting the possibility of deploying additional US military forces to the island.
During the press conference that day, when responding to questions about annexing Greenland, Trump straightforwardly stated, "I think it will happen." He also emphasized that the US already has stationed troops on the island, "and maybe in the future, there will be more (US) soldiers there."
Trump also noted that Rutte could "play an important role" in this matter, but Rutte clearly stated that related discussions were beyond his jurisdiction and emphasized that he "does not want to involve NATO in this matter."
Greenland is the largest island in the world, located in the northeast of North America, with significant geographical importance. Currently, the island is an autonomous territory under Denmark, with a high degree of autonomy, but defense and foreign affairs are managed by the Danish government. The US established military bases on Greenland during the Cold War, the most significant being the Thule Air Base in the northwest of the island.
Since last year's US presidential election, Trump has repeatedly expressed interest in Greenland, even publicly stating that he would not rule out the possibility of acquiring control over the island through "military or economic coercion." This move has sparked strong dissatisfaction from the Danish government, which has repeatedly reaffirmed the inviolability of Greenland's sovereignty and rejected any deals or negotiations. Trump's latest remarks may further exacerbate tensions between the US and Denmark and cause unrest within NATO.

The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
The U.S. Justice Department introduces new rules to limit foreign access to sensitive data.
{Current column}The U.S. Department of Justice released a new proposed rule on Monday aimed at protecting sensitive ...
Read morepremiumequity
{Current column}They said they need to trace the “withdrawal route” and want me to cover a $1,200 “audit path fee.” ...
Read moreOptimal Trade Solution froze my account after I requested a withdrawal. What do I do now?
{Current column}I requested to withdraw my $4,000 profit, and right after, they froze my account saying it was under ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Israel may attack Iran, gold hits a new high, market eyes US elections and monetary policy.
- provenancepartner says they’re changing their withdrawal provider and I need to pay to switch.
- Arllentrade claimed I violated their “terms of service” and froze my account. Should I be concerned?
- AstralFXTrade told me my profits were “too high” and now they’re withholding my funds.
- Huawei HarmonyOS Night scheduled, Mate 70 mass
- TrustVest Capital required me a $2,000 “risk management surcharge”
Latest articles
-
German Politics in Turmoil: Scholz May Face Pre
-
bitbytokens asked me to deposit more money before I can withdraw. What should I do?
-
EquinoxForexMarket promised quick withdrawals, they’re asking for a “transaction verification fee
-
Anyone else asked to download a third
-
U.S. Treasury yields hit a 12
-
CrypticBitFx informed me I need to pay a “withdrawal processing fee”