Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Wells Fargo is expected to pay 1.8 billion dollars to replenish the FDIC fund.
{Current column}34People have watched
IntroductionLast Thursday, U.S. banking regulators announced a series of reforms for the banking sector includin ...
Last Thursday,drcfx foreign exchange platform formal U.S. banking regulators announced a series of reforms for the banking sector including raising capital requirements for large banks, aimed at strengthening the financial system's resilience to risks. The regulatory authorities indicated that if these standards are fully implemented, the capital requirements for large banks will increase by 16% over current levels, with the largest and most complex banking institutions being significantly affected.
Against this backdrop, Wells Fargo stated in documents submitted to regulatory agencies that according to proposals from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), it would need to make a payment of about 18 billion dollars to the Federal Deposit Insurance Fund following the finalization of the new rules. In the first half of the year, the collapse of three financial institutions, including Silicon Valley Bank, resulted in a loss of about 16 billion dollars for the Federal Deposit Insurance Fund.
Wells Fargo mentioned that a separate proposal concerning U.S. capital rules might lead to a reevaluation of its balance sheet, with new guidelines altering its risk indicators for lending, trading, and internal operations. Based on a preliminary assessment of the proposed rules, the company expects a significant increase in its risk-weighted assets and a rise in net capital requirements. This marks the first public commentary by a major U.S. bank since the proposal was issued.
Furthermore, Wells Fargo indicated in its regulatory submission that the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission are investigating the retention of chat records by employees on unauthorized communication applications. Previously, after it was discovered that employees discussed transactions on personal devices and applications, U.S. regulators fined 16 financial firms a total of 1.8 billion dollars.
Risk Warning and DisclaimerThe market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
Goldman Sachs no longer expects Fed rate hike in June By Reuters
{Current column}(Reuters) -Economists at Goldman Sachs (NYSE:) no longer expect the U.S. Federal Reserve to raise in ...
Read moreIs GulfCM a legit or a scam? GulfCM Review
{Current column}FTI's top 100 forex brokers you can refer to for selection. If it is not in the top 100, you sho ...
Read moreIs Geomatrix a legit or a scam? Geomatrix Review
{Current column}FTI's top 100 forex brokers you can refer to for selection. If it is not in the top 100, you sho ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Instant View: Alibaba to split into six units By Reuters
- Is Mdcforex a legit or a scam? Mdcforex Review
- Is INNO QUANTUM a legit or a scam? INNO QUANTUM Review
- Is Integral Yatirim a legit or a scam? Integral Yatirim Review
- Aussie tumbles after RBA pauses rate hikes, dollar rebounds By Reuters
- Is Mdcforex a legit or a scam? Mdcforex Review
Latest articles
-
China's Huawei partners with more automakers to produce Aito EVs By Reuters
-
Is Point Blank Capital a legit or a scam? Point Blank Capital Review
-
Is Park Money FX a legit or a scam? Park Money FX Review
-
Is Doo Tech a legit or a scam? Doo Tech Review
-
Pfizer CEO calls US drug price plan 'negotiation with a gun to your head' By Reuters
-
Is Blue Ocean Voyages a legit or a scam? Blue Ocean Voyages Review