Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
The inversion of U.S. Treasury yield curves signals a rising risk of economic recession.
{Current column}82115People have watched
IntroductionThe inverted yield curve signal in the US Treasury market has sparked concerns about an economic rec ...

The inverted yield curve signal in the US Treasury market has sparked concerns about an economic recession. The yield on the 10-year Treasury note has fallen below that of the 3-month Treasury bill, a phenomenon that has accurately predicted past recessions over several decades. The New York Fed's updated recession probability model indicates that with this inversion, there is a significantly increased likelihood of a US recession within the next 12 months.
Analysts say the current inverted yield curve reflects investors' fears about economic growth and could signal a significant slowdown in economic activity. However, this signal is not absolute, as a similar inversion in October 2022 did not result in a recession.
Meanwhile, recent economic data has exacerbated recession concerns. The US consumer confidence index saw a sharp decline in February, particularly the consumer expectations index, which fell below the recession warning threshold. These indicators, combined with persistently high inflation expectations, further deepen worries about the economic outlook.
Nevertheless, some economists believe the US economy remains resilient and shows no imminent signs of recession. Tom Porcelli, chief economist at PGIM Fixed Income, noted that while economic activity may slow, a full-blown recession is not anticipated.
Expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts are also rising, with traders betting that the Fed will cut rates twice this year and once next year to address the pressures from the economic slowdown.

The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
Trump's victory raises recession concerns, with U.S. recession probability now at 75%.
{Current column}With Trump's victory in the latest election, BCA Research has raised the probability of a U.S. ...
Read moreTradeEasyFX introduced a $2,250 “withdrawal approval cost” out of nowhere on me
{Current column}I had completed all KYC steps and was told withdrawals were possible. Now, this surprise fee stands ...
Read moreBittrexMarkets told me I must pay $1,850 “security clearance surcharge”
{Current column}This fee was never disclosed during account registration or in any terms I agreed to. I submitted al ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Israeli airstrikes kill Nasrallah, Biden faces diplomatic dilemma
- CANYON is demanding a $1,600 "non
- Rise Trade said my account is “under review,” they want me to pay a $1,000 fee for further process
- 7staroptions said I need to pay an 'insurance fee' before withdrawing.
- ZenithTrustCorp hit me with a $1,850 “security inspection payment” just as I tried to withdraw.
- TM9 said I need to make a 'final payment' of $3,000 before withdrawing.
Latest articles
-
Iran turns to the West for peace, potentially rendering China and Russia's efforts in vain.
-
XTPBTC said I need to pay a 'document verification fee' to process my withdrawal.
-
Real Cash Calling said I need to pay a ‘client retention fee’ to release my funds. Is this normal?
-
NitroPrime Capitals claimed I need to pay a ‘market condition fee’ before I can access my funds.
-
Brazil's September inflation rose due to soaring electricity costs and drought.
-
Rise Trade said my account is “under review,” they want me to pay a $1,000 fee for further process