Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Chart Of The Day: Will The Nasdaq 100 Continue To 10,000?
{Current column}6People have watched
IntroductionUS futures and European stocks were in the green, as positive earnings and a dovish interpretation o ...
US futures and Ranking of foreign exchange trading platformsEuropean stocks were in the green, as positive earnings and a dovish interpretation of Federal Reserve rhetoric reassured investors.
Moreover, easing yields buttressed the argument of a pivoting Fed. Presumably, if investors expected continuously higher rates, they'd sell Treasuries, pushing yields higher, as they await higher-yielding Treasuries.
However, in my opinion, while it may be textbook behavior for yields to point the way forward for rates, I think investors forget something. The yield curve is inverted!
So what, you ask?
Well, let's break it down. Why is the yield curve inverted?
Because investors have been buying longer-dated bonds than shorter-dated bonds, althoughthe longer commitments provided a lower yield. In a typical market environment, that doesn't make sense. They are only willing to commit for longer for a lower yield. If they buy a shorter-dated Treasury now, there is no telling what the market environment will be at maturity, and traders' cash will be exposed.
In other words, investors are not buying bonds for their yields but for safety. If that's the case, increasing Treasury demand, which pushes the yield lower, does not suggest an expectation for lower rates. Furthermore, I expect 10-year yields to fall lower yet, maybe even against a rising 2-year yield, steepening the inverted yield curve.
10-2 year Treasury Yield Daily
The 10-year yield climbed Friday above the neckline of an H&S top. However, it fell today back below it (barely), and the 50 and 100 DMAs curve down, suggesting 10-year yields will resume along their falling channel. Conversely, the 2-year yield broke the topside of a Symmetrical Triangle within an uptrend, indicating the lower dated bond will continue higher, steepening the yield curve inversion.
Big tech has been outperforming in the current rally, and I believe it's on the mistaken notion of a peaking Fed tightening cycle. Big tech should suffer the most during rising rates because higher borrowing costs outprice their valuations relative to neglected cyclicals, which provide significant value. If I am right, and this has been a bear rally rather than a bottom, the NASDAQ 100 should take the biggest hit. The technicals agree that the mega-tech index is overextended.
NASDAQ 100 Weekly
The NDX has been trading along a falling channel. On Friday, the index fell after reaching the top of the boundary. It just so happened that it's the same level as the previous low in March, adding to the resistance. The long-term downtrend is much more potent than the short-term uptrend, as much more interest is invested in it.
Also, note the two negative divergences: the Accumulation/Distribution and the Advance-Decline Line. While the former has an eighth of its peak breadth, the Accumulation/Distribution indicator has been flat in the current rally.
Trading Strategies
Conservative tradersshould wait for a long weekly candle to confirm that the falling channels remain intact before risking a short position.
Moderate traderswould be content with a week that fails to break out the channel top.
Aggressive traderscould short now, provided they accept the higher risk proportionate to the higher rewards of moving before the rest of the market. You must operate according to a coherent trade plan that incorporates your timing, budget, and temperament. However, if you don't know how to do that yet, feel free to practice with the following sample, understanding it's just a generic sample and does not represent the validity of the analysis. You do so for education, not profit, or you'll end up with neither. I guarantee it. No money back. Happy trading!
Trade Sample - Aggressive Short Position
- Entry: 13,326
- Stop-Loss: 13,526
- Risk: 200 points
- Target: 11,326
- Reward: 2,000 points
- Risk-Reward Ratio: 1:10
Disclaimer: The author currently does not own any of the securities mentioned in this article.
Statement: The content of this article does not represent the views of FTI website. The content is for reference only and does not constitute investment suggestions. Investment is risky, so you should be careful in your choice! If it involves content, copyright and other issues, please contact us and we will make adjustments at the first time!Tags:
Related articles
Norwegian wealth fund seeks Credit Suisse boardroom shake
{Current column}(Reuters) - Norges Bank Investment Management will vote against the re-election of Credit Suisse Cha ...
Read moreMJ Trading Trading Is Safe? Company Abbreviation MJ Trading
{Current column}FTI's top 100 foreign exchange brokers can be selected by reference. If they are not within 100, ...
Read moreU.S. stocks are mixed as investors absorb inflation news By
{Current column}By Liz Moyer-- U.S. stocks were mixed on Friday after staging a massive rally the day before on the ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Dollar edges up on credit report, sterling hovers near one
- Musk says Twitter to soon enable organizations to identify their associated accounts By Reuters
- Dow Futures Move Higher After Negative Session By
- Dollar rebounds as Fed officials say hikes to continue; yen slumps By Reuters
- NATO soldiers injured in Kosovo clashes with Serb protesters By Reuters
- European shares open higher on boost from miners By Reuters
Latest articles
-
Dow futures fall 35 pts; confidence fragile even as banking tensions ease By
-
Hot M&A Catch
-
DEFI Investment Trading Is Safe? Company Abbreviation DEFI Investment
-
Germany's Scholz visits Vietnam as manufacturers eye shift from China By Reuters
-
Dollar edges higher, with all eyes on the Federal Reserve By
-
Some countries have resisted 1.5°C goal in COP27 text, US says By Reuters