Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Iran proposes meeting with Europe to resume negotiations.
{Current column}19939People have watched
IntroductionAccording to foreign media reports, four diplomats revealed on Monday that Iran has proposed to meet ...

According to foreign media reports, four diplomats revealed on Monday that Iran has proposed to meet with European parties to the 2015 nuclear agreement before resuming talks with the United States. Iran hopes to meet with the UK, France, and Germany (known as E3) in Rome this Friday to discuss issues related to the nuclear agreement. However, the European parties have not yet formally responded to this proposal.
Omani officials stated that a new round of talks between the US and Iran might be held in Europe on May 3, but no formal decision has been made yet. Iran's proposal to the E3 indicates Tehran's desire to assess the European position before resuming negotiations, particularly regarding the possible re-imposition of UN sanctions. The UN sanctions on Iran are set to expire this October, at which time the resolutions approving the 2015 nuclear agreement will also face reassessment.
Two E3 diplomats and a western diplomat suggested that the proposal was made by Iran after discussions with the U.S. last Saturday, and Iran hopes to hold a meeting in Rome this Friday. If Rome is not feasible as a meeting place, Iran has indicated a willingness to consider discussions in Tehran before this date.
This proposal highlights Iran's stance of retaining options before resuming nuclear agreement talks, while also reflecting Tehran's desire to ensure European policies in the coming months, especially regarding UN sanctions. With the expiration of the resolutions related to the 2015 nuclear agreement approaching, discussions between Iran and European parties could significantly impact future international diplomatic dynamics.

The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
Tariff pressures may drive South Korea to boost U.S. investments amid Trump’s policies.
{Current column}With the newly elected U.S. President Trump's proposed policy changes potentially increasing ta ...
Read moreOxlore Trades is telling me I need to pay a “currency conversion fee” to withdraw. Is this normal?
{Current column}They said I need to pay a $1,000 “currency conversion fee” before I can withdraw my funds. This is t ...
Read moreTQX Global Impecc won’t release my profits unless I pay a "system upgrade fee."
{Current column}I’ve earned $7,000 with TQX Global Impeccable Trading, but now they’re saying I need to pay $1,500 f ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- “liquidity verification fee”? BitStockTrades surprised me by introducing this?
- Cmcfxsignals said I need to pay a “fund protection fee” to protect my balance. Is this standard?
- Insightmarketcharts asked for a “compliance waiver” fee. What’s that?
- Bitminerix told me that I need to make a “final adjustment” to my account before I can withdraw.
- Oil giants fear Middle East conflict, expect rising demand, adding energy transition pressure.
- Stockdigitalmar told me I need to make a “final investment” before I can withdraw.
Latest articles
-
Bezes Unveils New Website Version
-
coinespert said my account was “temporarily suspended” after I requested a withdrawal.
-
krypto Xperts Trade said I need to pay a “verification tax” before I can withdraw. Should I proceed?
-
Stellar Pioneer Incorporated is asking for a “payment confirmation fee” before I can get my money.
-
The truth of the deal you have been desperately seeking can be summed up in eight words.
-
Goldencoinassets has locked my account after I tried to withdraw. What should I do now?