Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Boeing's aircraft deliveries to China resume soon, faces lawsuit from US Justice Department.
{Current column}82People have watched
IntroductionAccording to flight tracking data and two sources, Boeing has resumed deliveries of wide-body aircra ...
According to flight tracking data and Money circle foreign exchange profit 5-10 timestwo sources, Boeing has resumed deliveries of wide-body aircraft to China. This follows a period in recent weeks when deliveries were halted due to scrutiny from Chinese regulators, also affecting the delivery of new narrow-body aircraft.
A source told Reuters that all Boeing deliveries to China will now be resumed.
Since 2019, deliveries of new Boeing aircraft to China have been intermittent due to two fatal MAX 8 crashes and tensions between Washington and Beijing over issues such as technology and national security.
The resumption of deliveries is good news for Boeing, which had previously informed investors about the delays in Chinese deliveries and is currently facing another safety and quality crisis.
Last Friday, a brand-new Boeing 777 wide-body freighter (registration number B-223S) flew from Boeing's factory at Paine Field in Everett, Washington to Beijing, owned by China Cargo Airlines, according to FlightRadar24's flight tracking platform.
Later on Sunday, another brand-new 777 freighter, registered as B-223T, also flew from Paine Field to Beijing, according to tracking data.
Air China has not commented on this.
A source told Reuters last week that several 777 and 787 wide-body aircraft deliveries are expected in the coming days, and deliveries of the 737 MAX are expected to resume as early as July.
Due to two fatal crashes in 2018 and 2019, the 737 MAX was grounded worldwide, and China suspended most Boeing aircraft orders and deliveries since 2019. Reuters reported on Sunday that the U.S. Department of Justice will charge Boeing with fraud related to the two crashes.
Risk Warning and DisclaimerThe market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
TrustVest Capital required me a $2,000 “risk management surcharge”
{Current column}There was no prior mention of this fee in any documentation or during registration. I had completed ...
Read moreChegg announces it will cut a quarter of its workforce; stock soars nearly 20% after the news.
{Current column}Education technology group Chegg recently announced plans to cut 23% of its global workforce as part ...
Read moreElon Musk announced that the new compensation plan has been approved by vote.
{Current column}The shareholder resolutions regarding Tesla CEO Elon Musk's $56 billion compensation plan and t ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- kriskopy imposed a $1,860 “security audit fee” , anyone met this? I need help
- More insider information? Pelosi increases holdings in Nvidia and Broadcom, sells Tesla.
- Top traders excel at going against the grain in a market driven by desires.
- Latest market news update
- Autobot Asset shocked me by demanding “risk management fee”
- To trade profitably, there are actually three methods.
Latest articles
-
U.S. September CPI beats expectations, may impact Fed policy.
-
More insider information? Pelosi increases holdings in Nvidia and Broadcom, sells Tesla.
-
There are countless forex platforms, so how should one determine which aspects to judge them on?
-
[Morning] Interest Rate Cuts Approach, Gold Prices Strong
-
Huawei HarmonyOS Night scheduled, Mate 70 mass
-
In early trading, the global economy slows down, making gold highly attractive.