Duke faces potential loss of federal funding over discrimination allegations.

Duke University Faces Civil Rights Turmoil as Federal Investigation Intensifies

The U.S. Department of Education and the Department of Health and Human Services have recently launched a joint operation against Duke University and its affiliates to investigate alleged racial discrimination in its law journal selection and medical education processes. This incident marks a high-stakes phase of federal scrutiny into the legality of "affirmative action" in higher education.

Duke University, a renowned private institution in the U.S., is famous for its academic and research excellence. However, the current inquiry focuses on whether the institution incorporates racial factors in its academic or employment evaluations. If the investigation finds these allegations to be true, the university could face severe consequences, including cuts in federal funding and collaboration restrictions.

Joint Letter from Multiple Departments Signals Clear Accountability

The joint investigation originated from a recent report on the selection process of personnel for the Duke Law Journal. The report claims that some candidates received additional points due to their racial background or specific ethnic identity, causing outrage among civil rights organizations.

In response, Education Secretary Linda McMahon and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr. have sent a letter to Duke University's administration, expressing grave concern over "interference in academic evaluations through racial preferences" and demanding immediate corrective actions from the school. The letter explicitly states, "Federal funds should not be used to finance institutional biases."

Imminent Establishment of Civil Rights Committee, Six-Month Rectification Deadline

To ensure a controlled timeline for investigation and rectification, the federal government has proposed that Duke University establish a "Merit and Civil Rights Committee" led by the board of directors. This committee is expected to conduct a comprehensive evaluation within six months on whether structural discrimination exists within the institution and propose solutions.

The letter further notes that if no substantial correction is observed after six months, or if significant disagreements arise between the government and the school during the investigation, enforcement procedures will immediately commence. This statement has been interpreted as a strong signal urging Duke to make a choice.

Debate Over Educational Resource Fairness, Increasing "Anti-Affirmative Action" Trend

This investigation is not an isolated case. Since 2024, the U.S. government has launched similar investigations into dozens of colleges, all revolving around whether race is a deciding factor in admissions, scholarships, and program selections. Universities collaborating with projects like The Ph.D. Project, which promotes diversity among students, are coming under scrutiny.

Supporters argue that such programs help bridge structural educational gaps for disadvantaged communities. However, critics claim that these measures deviate from the principle of "equal opportunity," indirectly depriving other groups of a fair chance to compete. The investigation into Duke exemplifies this policy-level controversy.

Federal Funding Becomes Core of the Dilemma, University Faces a Tough Choice

As the federal government takes a more conservative stance, funding issues become unavoidable strategic elements for higher education institutions. Statistics show that Duke University receives research and educational support worth hundreds of millions of dollars annually from federal agencies. A halt or freeze in these funds would significantly impact the university's operations and reputation.

In this context, Duke University and similar elite institutions are forced to balance "academic independence" with "financial dependence." Ensuring that inclusive policies do not cross federal legal boundaries is becoming a new challenge in university governance.

The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.