Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
The Trump administration requests the removal of the credit card late fee cap.
{Current column}69People have watched
IntroductionOn April 14, the Trump administration requested the federal court to revoke the new regulations set ...
On April 14,How much money can you make with 10,000 foreign exchange in a day the Trump administration requested the federal court to revoke the new regulations set by the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) regarding credit card late fee caps. The government aligned with the business and banking groups that, in a lawsuit, argued the regulation violated the law. According to these regulations, the fee cap for late payments is set at $8, unless the card issuer can prove it necessary to charge a higher fee to cover costs.
The Trump administration, alongside the business groups involved in the lawsuit, filed documents with the federal court in Texas, requesting Fort Worth Federal District Judge Mark Pittman to make a final ruling terminating the late fee regulation. Judge Pittman had previously blocked the CFPB from implementing this regulation, which is part of Democratic President Biden's initiative to combat "junk fees."
The Trump administration had previously attempted to dissolve the CFPB but was partially blocked by the courts. A federal appeals court ruled that the government could reduce the staff of the CFPB but could not completely eliminate the agency. Since its inception, the CFPB has faced criticism from Republicans, accusing it of lacking accountability and overstepping its powers through enforcement actions against financial companies.
According to the original CFPB regulation, card issuers with over one million active accounts could not charge more than $8 in late fees unless they could demonstrate that higher fees were necessary to cover actual costs. Last December, Judge Pittman ruled that this regulation violated the 2009 Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure Act, which limits excessive fees but allows card issuers to charge "penalty" fees when customers breach credit card agreements.
This lawsuit and the Trump administration's involvement signify a further escalation in the dispute over CFPB's regulatory power and fee regulations.
Risk Warning and DisclaimerThe market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
Debt limit progress, weak Chinese data
{Current column}-- The stage is set for a dramatic vote on the debt ceiling bill in the House of Representatives as ...
Read moreIs FXPRIMUS Markets a Reputable Forex Company? An Overview
{Current column}FTI's top 100 forex brokers you can refer to for selection. If it is not in the top 100, you sho ...
Read moreIs NordFX Forex still available?
{Current column}NordFX Forex is still being used by people, and despite reports of people being scammed, there is al ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- US evacuated under 100 people from embassy in Sudan amid fighting By Reuters
- How Reliable is INGOT? An Introduction and Review
- Should You Trust Orbex Forex Broker? Orbex Review
- Is OEXN a Reputable Forex Company? An Overview
- Police arrest 52 including republicans during King Charles' coronation By Reuters
- Is OGFX Forex Broker Legit or a Scam? A Detailed Review
Latest articles
-
AMD forecasts second quarter below estimates with slow chip demand By Reuters
-
GMI: Is This Forex Broker Legit or a Scam?
-
Is Tickmill a Reputable Forex Company? An Overview
-
Are there things to look for in a Brickhill platform? What about it?
-
Oil prices muted after bruising week as economic concerns grow By
-
Is BCR Forex Broker Legit or a Scam? A Detailed Review