Powell speaks out in defense of the central bank's independence.

Federal Reserve Headquarters Renovation Under Scrutiny, Powell Responds in Writing

On July 17 local time, Federal Reserve Chairman Powell made a rare written response to public doubts about the Federal Reserve's renovation project. Recently, the Trump administration has repeatedly criticized the renovation plan of the Federal Reserve headquarters as "luxurious and wasteful," increasing political pressure on Chairman Powell, demanding concessions in monetary policy.

In response, Powell stated that since its approval in 2017, the renovation has been under audit and supervision, with all expenditures clearly recorded and internally monitored. He emphasized that the Federal Reserve building faces structural aging, asbestos contamination, and outdated electrical and heating systems. The renovation is meant to ensure employee safety and functional upgrades, with no "waste" involved.

Prudent Cost Control, Design Changes Did Not Violate Procedures

Powell noted in his response that during the renovation, some design optimizations were made based on actual conditions, including changing some materials and adjusting spatial layout to reduce the budget and avoid construction delays. He emphasized that these changes do not involve structural alterations and therefore do not require resubmitting approval processes.

In response to accusations of "cost overruns," Powell explained that some cost increases stemmed from uncontrollable risks, such as discovering large amounts of asbestos and lead, and higher groundwater levels. These are common adjustments in construction, duly reported to the internal audit system.

Transparent Oversight, Project Unaffected by Political Interference

Facing the Trump administration's claim of "unregulated renovation," Powell clarified that the Federal Reserve is not under the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) but cooperates on planning matters in a "voluntary collaboration." The project is led by the Federal Reserve Board, with continuous oversight by internal monitoring institutions, and legal supervision rests with the Federal Reserve system itself.

This statement reaffirms Powell's commitment to the Federal Reserve's independent status, intending to convey that both the project and policy are free from political interference, maintaining its technical neutrality and prudent governance principles.

Increased Pressure from Trump, Market Concerned About Political Interference

This year, Trump has frequently criticized Powell in public speeches for "not lowering interest rates effectively" and "hindering economic recovery," repeatedly hinting at potential replacement. Recent remarks about the $2.5 billion renovation project are seen as an extension of political pressure.

Though Trump denied any immediate plans to replace Powell, several government officials have revealed internal discussions on related options. The market is generally worried that increased political interference in Federal Reserve policies will weaken its credibility, impacting confidence in dollar assets and financial system stability.

Clear Indications of Federal Reserve's Independence, Focus Returns to Institutional Autonomy

Powell's proactive response aims to address a series of political doubts and convey a firm stance on maintaining institutional neutrality to the market and public. The transparent management and prudent processes of the Federal Reserve are key to its long-standing trust from global markets.

At this time, with the political environment becoming more complex and the choice of Federal Reserve chairman again sparking controversy, balancing policy independence with government expectations becomes the biggest challenge for Powell's leadership team. The Federal Reserve's ability to continue its stable policies may profoundly affect its reputation and position in global financial governance.

The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.