Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
U.S. appeals court refuses FTC request to pause Microsoft deal for Activision By Reuters
{Current column}96People have watched
Introduction(Reuters) -A U.S. appeals court on Friday rejected the Federal Trade Commission's request to pause M ...
(Reuters) -A U.S. appeals court on Top 10 foreign exchange platform providers in the worldFriday rejected the Federal Trade Commission's request to pause Microsoft (NASDAQ:)'s $69 billion purchase of "Call of Duty" maker Activision Blizzard (NASDAQ:).
The appeals court decision removes one of the few remaining hurdles stopping Xbox maker Microsoft from closing the deal and expanding its gaming business.

The FTC had also asked Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley of the U.S. District Court in northern California for a similar stay but she rejected that request late on Thursday.
The FTC did not return an immediate request for comment.
Microsoft President Brad Smith said, "We appreciate the Ninth Circuit's swift response denying the FTC's motion to further delay the deal. This brings us another step closer to the finish line in this marathon of global regulatory reviews."
The deal, the largest in the history of the videogame industry, still needs to be approved in Britain.
The merger agreement between Microsoft and Activision will expire on July 18. After July 18, either company will be free to walk away from the deal unless they negotiate an extension.
In the UK, the Competition and Markets Authority opposes the transaction on concerns about the impact on competition in cloud gaming. On Friday it received a "detailed and complex" new proposal from Microsoft, and extended its deadline for a final ruling to Aug. 29, although it said it would aim to do it as soon as possible.
In the United States, the FTC had argued the deal would hurt consumers whether they played video games on consoles or had subscriptions because Microsoft would have an incentive to shut out rivals like (NYSE:) Group. Microsoft responded to that by offering 10-year licenses to rivals.
But on Tuesday, Judge Corley ruled the deal was legal under antitrust law and declined the FTC request to slap a preliminary injunction on it to give the FTC time to take it before an internal FTC judge in August.
Statement: The content of this article does not represent the views of FTI website. The content is for reference only and does not constitute investment suggestions. Investment is risky, so you should be careful in your choice! If it involves content, copyright and other issues, please contact us and we will make adjustments at the first time!
Tags:
Related articles
Oil slips as U.S. debt caution offset supply concerns By Reuters
{Current column}By Florence TanSINGAPORE (Reuters) -Oil prices slipped on Monday as caution around the U.S. debt cei ...
Read moreIs CazenoveCapital a legit or a scam? CazenoveCapital Review
{Current column}FTI's top 100 forex brokers you can refer to for selection. If it is not in the top 100, you sho ...
Read moreIs ForexBull a legit or a scam? ForexBull Review
{Current column}FTI's top 100 forex brokers you can refer to for selection. If it is not in the top 100, you sho ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- US government may delay decision on electric vehicles biofuel program By Reuters
- Is NFU Mutual a legit or a scam? NFU Mutual Review
- Is KCM Trade a legit or a scam? KCM Trade Review
- Is FxPro a legit or a scam? 浦汇FxPro Review
- Dollar steady as debt ceiling worries weigh; Kiwi slips 1% By Reuters
- Is UFX a legit or a scam? UFX Review
Latest articles
-
Nvidia chips away at Intel, AMD turf in supercomputers By Reuters
-
Is Yunhe a legit or a scam? Yunhe Review
-
Is Fiovation a legit or a scam? Fiovation Review
-
Is FxPro a legit or a scam? 浦汇FxPro Review
-
Hawkers back on China's streets as economic recovery teeters By Reuters
-
Is Ueeforex a legit or a scam? Ueeforex Review