Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Tesla shareholders clash over Musk's huge salary, formal vote to be held on 6/13
{Current column}82664People have watched
IntroductionAccording to a Bloomberg report on Monday, longtime Tesla shareholder Baillie Gifford, a Scottish fu ...
According to a Bloomberg report on What kind of platform is Tibetan business tradingMonday, longtime Tesla shareholder Baillie Gifford, a Scottish fund management company, plans to support Elon Musk and vote in favor of his $56 billion compensation package, citing unnamed sources.
Shareholders are set to vote on Musk's compensation package on June 13. The package was approved in 2018 but was later overturned and invalidated by a Delaware judge, requiring Tesla to seek re-approval.
According to sources, Musk has already secured Baillie Gifford's support. The company has been holding Tesla stock for over a decade and was once Tesla's second-largest shareholder before reducing its stake to 0.5%. Sources say that Musk has met the ambitious targets set in 2018.
Baillie Gifford declined to comment on the matter to Bloomberg.
However, not everyone supports Musk's $56 billion compensation package.
Institutional Shareholder Services has recommended shareholders vote against the compensation package, and Norway's sovereign wealth fund, Norges Bank Investment Management, also stated last week that it will vote against it.
In a recent report, Wedbush noted that this compensation package controversy is just one of many burdens pressing on Tesla's stock. However, approving the package would be a key step in eliminating this "distraction." Currently, many are skeptical about Tesla's demand amid fierce competition in China and a slowdown in electric vehicle sales.


The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
Personal Analysis of Gold on August 1:
{Current column}New Month, August 1st - Personal Subjective Analysis of Gold:The July rate decision, announced early ...
Read moreThe French government collapses, raising default risk and worsening woes due to political deadlock.
{Current column}On December 4th, local time, the French National Assembly passed a motion of no confidence against t ...
Read moreHonda's Prologue SUV sees strong sales and loyalty, challenging Tesla's market share.
{Current column}In the three months ending September 30, Honda's first electric mid-size SUV, the Prologue, sol ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Firstgaininvestments unexpectedly introduced a $2,200 “withdrawal clearance surcharge”
- ECB and BOE signal rate cuts, with data key to policy adjustments.
- Iran accuses the U.S. of spreading terrorism in Syria through its illegal military presence.
- Political Impact on the U.S. Treasury Market: Trump's Election and Besant's Appointment.
- 247digitalmarket surprised me with the $990 “risk management charge”
- Fed's hawkish cuts boost the dollar, pressuring currencies and reshaping rates.
Latest articles
-
The Bank of Japan holds rates amid uncertainties, cautiously advancing monetary policy adjustments.
-
The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics will reclaim outsourced positions after data release errors.
-
Political Impact on the U.S. Treasury Market: Trump's Election and Besant's Appointment.
-
Ruling party leader's stance shift pressures Yoon, heightening market uncertainty.
-
kriskopy imposed a $1,860 “security audit fee” , anyone met this? I need help
-
Trump's tariff threats cloud Sino