Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
AP journalist banned for refusing to rename "Gulf of Mexico."
{Current column}3People have watched
IntroductionOn February 12, 2025, U.S. President Trump signed an executive order on his first day in office, ren ...
On February 12,atfx official website 2025, U.S. President Trump signed an executive order on his first day in office, renaming the "Gulf of Mexico" to the "Gulf of America," a move that sparked widespread controversy. On the 12th, a reporter from the Associated Press was once again banned from attending an event in the Oval Office for refusing to change the name as per the executive order. This marks the second time in two days that Associated Press journalists have faced such treatment; the previous day, two other journalists from the Associated Press were also barred from participating in White House events for the same reason.
In a press briefing that day, the White House Press Secretary addressed questions from reporters about the matter. Reporters expressed concerns, arguing that the measure restricted press freedom and questioned why the government had such a strong response. Trump's executive order not only impacted Associated Press journalists but also sparked widespread debate about the legality of government actions.
Additionally, several major American tech companies, including Google, Apple, and Microsoft, have begun implementing the name change on their map platforms. Google announced on the 10th that its map platform would display different names for users in different regions, with American users seeing "Gulf of America" while users in Mexico and other areas would still see "Gulf of Mexico."
This incident has not only intensified political controversy within the United States but also increased the pressure on the Trump administration to balance issues of press freedom with executive orders.
Risk Warning and DisclaimerThe market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
ZenithTrustCorp hit me with a $1,850 “security inspection payment” just as I tried to withdraw.
{Current column}This fee was never disclosed during signup or trading. Despite having an approved account, this sudd ...
Read moreI think I’ve been scammed by capital Stocks Trade. My account is locked, and I can’t get my money.
{Current column}I deposited $6,000 into capitalstockstrade, and things were going smoothly. However, when I tried to ...
Read morePractical Gold Market Trends: How to Use Fibonacci Extension Lines
{Current column}Practical Gold Market Analysis: How to Use Fibonacci Extension Lines:Yesterday, a student asked how ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- U.S. Treasury yields hit a 12
- TrustVest Capital required me a $2,000 “risk management surcharge”
- BittrexMarkets told me I must pay $1,850 “security clearance surcharge”
- Real World Finance Trade is asking me to pay a $1,800 “withdrawal integrity verification charge”
- U.S. CPI release: Can gold's correction shift? Market watches inflation.
- Is lbxlsc.com a legit platform or a scam?
Latest articles
-
Canada's July GDP beat expectations, fueling interest rate cut speculation.
-
I think I’ve been scammed by capital Stocks Trade. My account is locked, and I can’t get my money.
-
Monday, 7/22, a new week, a new beginning.
-
Yields on South Korean government bonds face upward pressure amid policy shifts and supply rise
-
Metaindextrade forced me to pay “account clearance payment”? Why?
-
Tradingsedgar asked me for more money to withdraw. I think I’ve been scammed.