Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Boeing crash victims' families reject DOJ plea deal, demanding higher fines from Boeing.
{Current column}31343People have watched
IntroductionOn Wednesday, the families of 346 victims who died in two fatal Boeing 737 MAX crashes stated that a ...
On Wednesday,Guohui Asia the families of 346 victims who died in two fatal Boeing 737 MAX crashes stated that a U.S. judge should reject the plea deal between the aircraft manufacturer and the Department of Justice, and demand the government seek higher fines.
On July 24th, Boeing Company finalized an agreement to plead guilty to a criminal fraud conspiracy charge and pay up to $487 million in fines after violating a deferred prosecution agreement from 2021.
Paul Cassell, an attorney representing some of the victims' families, stated in court documents that the fines were "inadequate or at least based on misleading and inaccurate accounting data." He added that the fines "failed to reflect that Boeing's crimes led to the deaths of 346 innocent victims." Cassell described this decision as "not only inaccurate but also morally reprehensible."
Another attorney representing the victims' families, Adrian Wukoivic, stated in a separate document: "We suggest that Boeing should pay a considerable fine that reflects the value of each of the 346 victims, the severe harm caused to others, and that this fine should be consistent with those imposed on other corporate criminal defendants."
The victims’ families cited a statement from O’Connor’s ruling in February 2023: "Boeing’s crimes can be considered as the deadliest corporate crime in U.S. history."
Spokespersons for Boeing and the Department of Justice did not immediately comment on the families' filings.


The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
SQLQD has demanded me a $950 “security verification charge”
{Current column}This fee was never mentioned during registration or anywhere in their terms. Despite completing full ...
Read moreWhat Is a Ballpark Figure? Several Key Points to Keep in Mind About Ballpark Figures
{Current column}What is a Ballpark Figure?A "ballpark figure" typically refers to a rough estimate or appr ...
Read moreWhat is the Falling Trilogy? What are its features? Does it always result in a drop?
{Current column}What is the Falling Trilogy?The Falling Trilogy is a candlestick pattern that emerges during a stock ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Shanghai's new property policy eases restrictions, boosting home
- What is Bancassurance? What issues should we be aware of regarding bancassurance?
- What are clearing and settlement? They process trades, differing in timing and function.
- What are spot goods? What issues should be considered in spot trading?
- German Politics in Turmoil: Scholz May Face Pre
- What is the Beijing Stock Exchange? How to list on the Beijing Stock Exchange and its trading rules
Latest articles
-
Bezes Unveils New Website Version
-
What is Bank Capital? What issues should we pay attention to regarding bank capital?
-
What is a rising triad? How is it applied?
-
What is a rising triad? How is it applied?
-
Bank of England may cut rates again, pound eyes 200
-
What is Offshore Finance? The Five Common Questions about Offshore Finance