Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Gundlach: The safe haven status of U.S. Treasury bonds is wavering.
{Current column}9People have watched
Introduction"New Bond King" Warns: U.S. Treasuries Losing Safe Haven StatusJeffrey Gundlach, founder o ...

"New Bond King" Warns: U.S. Treasuries Losing Safe Haven Status
Jeffrey Gundlach, founder of DoubleLine Capital, who is called the "New Bond King," recently pointed out in an interview that the current level of U.S. debt and interest expenditure has reached an "unsustainable" state. He candidly stated that long-term U.S. Treasuries are no longer a "truly risk-free investment," as market confidence in them is swiftly dwindling.
Gundlach remarked, "People now realize that long-term U.S. Treasuries are not truly a safe haven asset. The time for reckoning is approaching." This statement has garnered widespread attention, especially under the current pressure from inflation and fiscal deficits.
Comparing to Historical Crises, Gundlach Issues Risk Signal
Gundlach compared the current market situation to two historic major economic crises—before the 1999 internet bubble burst and before the 2006-2007 global financial crisis. He believes current market valuations are generally too high, and investors significantly underestimate the associated risks.
He emphasized that the U.S. has long relied on debt for operations, and as debt levels continue to rise and interest expenses increase, the risk premium for long-term bonds will naturally be adjusted upwards. This means that U.S. Treasury Bonds may face ongoing selling pressure in the future, with yields remaining high.
Recommendation to Increase Non-Dollar Assets, DoubleLine Shifts to Foreign Currency Allocation
Gundlach revealed that his managed asset portfolio has begun increasing exposure to non-dollar assets. "We believe it is prudent to embrace diversification in the current market phase," he said. He also mentioned that DoubleLine's funds have started to allocate foreign currency assets to mitigate potential risks of dollar depreciation or U.S. Treasury market volatility.
This trend is also confirmed by the increasing flow of funds into alternative assets such as gold, foreign exchange, and short-duration bonds.
Divergence in Long and Short-Term U.S. Treasury Yields, Market Experiencing Rare Structural Changes
In recent months, there have been noteworthy changes in the U.S. Treasury market. Although short-term bond yields have fallen due to expectations of interest rate cuts, the 30-year U.S. Treasury yield has risen against the trend. As of this Wednesday, the yield stood at 4.91%, having earlier exceeded 5.15%, hitting a near 20-year high.
Analysts believe this divergence in short- and long-term yields is extremely rare, last occurring in 2001. This indicates waning confidence in long-term lending to the U.S. government, with investors demanding higher returns for taking on such risk.
There are even speculations that the U.S. Treasury might be forced to adjust its debt structure, including reducing or pausing the issuance of long-term bonds. Large institutions such as PIMCO and TCW are also reducing their holdings of long-duration bonds and shifting towards shorter-term products with less interest rate risk.
Rising Focus on Gold and AI, Investment Strategies Must Be Cautious
Aside from debt issues, Gundlach also mentioned some long-term investment trends. He is optimistic about the prospects for gold, viewing it as having strong safe-haven properties amid rising market uncertainties. Additionally, he is interested in artificial intelligence and the Indian market, considering them as future growth highlights globally.
However, he cautioned that current market sentiment is reminiscent of bubble periods, and investors should be particularly wary of asset prices straying from fundamentals. "At this time, prudence and diversification are the most important strategies," Gundlach concluded.


The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
247digitalmarket surprised me with the $990 “risk management charge”
{Current column}The fee was never communicated during onboarding or in any documentation. I had completed all verifi ...
Read moreCOMETA is now demanding a $1,950 “international authorization levy”
{Current column}What makes this even more absurd is that they had already confirmed my withdrawal had been processed ...
Read morerichardginaforextrades surprised me with a $2,100 “fund transfer validation fee”
{Current column}I had followed every step they asked—submitted KYC documents, completed the verification process, an ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Personal Analysis of Gold on August 1:
- Secured Meta Fx surprised me with a $2,300 “transactional risk review fee”
- FxBennyLtd recently informed me that I need to pay a $1,950 “regulatory finalization charge”
- CryptoRipplets delayed my payout again
- My Precious Metals Investment Journey: Macro Bullion, From Choice to Trust
- Eco Stock Trading informed me I must pay a $2,200 “global remittance tax”
Latest articles
-
Tariff pressures may drive South Korea to boost U.S. investments amid Trump’s policies.
-
Secured Meta Fx surprised me with a $2,300 “transactional risk review fee”
-
Sterlinglobemarket suddenly informed me I need to pay a “release verification fee” of $1,250
-
247primebitts is now withholding my funds unless I pay a “compliance hold fee” of $1,200.
-
Close U.S. election races may delay results, with counting and legal challenges adding uncertainty.
-
Catalyst Markets recently informed me that a $2,400 “release confirmation levy”