Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Tariff pressures may drive South Korea to boost U.S. investments amid Trump’s policies.
{Current column}438People have watched
IntroductionWith the newly elected U.S. President Trump's proposed policy changes potentially increasing ta ...
With the newly elected U.S. President Trump's proposed policy changes potentially increasing tariffs on Futures trading app rankingimported goods, Korean companies have shown a heightened willingness to increase their investments in the U.S. South Korea's Trade Minister, Joo Hyung Hwan, stated that Trump's proposal to impose a 10% to 20% tariff on all U.S. imports would profoundly impact major trade-dependent economies, including South Korea. In response, Korean companies may choose to expand their direct investment and local production in the U.S. to avoid potential tariff burdens.
Minister Joo pointed out that Korean companies have already established investment layouts in the U.S., but tariff changes will accelerate this trend. He specifically mentioned that the future export of South Korea's small and medium-sized component manufacturers to the U.S. might increase because they can use localized production to circumvent tariff barriers and maintain competitiveness.
A recent estimate from a South Korean state-run think tank indicates that if comprehensive tariff policies are implemented, South Korea could face export losses of up to $44.8 billion. This assessment highlights the risks of potential changes in trade policies by the Trump administration for Korean companies and presents challenges for the economic relationship between the two countries.
Joo Hyung Hwan additionally noted that the South Korean government will closely monitor the progress of new U.S. policies and actively communicate with businesses to assess and assist in mitigating potential impacts. In the future, South Korea's investment in the U.S. may grow further, especially in the automotive, electronics, and component manufacturing sectors, to strengthen their competitive position in the U.S. market and reduce reliance on import tariffs.


The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
Oil giants fear Middle East conflict, expect rising demand, adding energy transition pressure.
{Current column}Amid the current global economic uncertainties, senior executives of oil companies are collectively ...
Read more[Morning Market] Inflation Pressure Eases, Major Event Tonight
{Current column}Gold Market:Last night (August 13), the U.S. Department of Labor released the July Producer Price In ...
Read moreSubjective Personal Analysis on Gold for 7/30:
{Current column}As anticipated, the market declined yesterday. Congratulations to the students who entered short pos ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- HorizonCapitalMarket surprised me by introducing a $1,880 “liquidity management charge”
- SilverFx24Option unexpectedly demanded a $1,900 “final payout clearance fee”
- OffizielleKryptoBorse blocked my $2,100 withdrawal
- Initial jobless claims in the United States drop to a four
- U.S. election results and Fed meeting near—could gold’s pullback be a buying opportunity?
- Prime FX CFD imposed a $870 “final compliance payment” as a last
Latest articles
-
Metaindextrade forced me to pay “account clearance payment”? Why?
-
$1,060 security audit was charged on me, why? Copy Express Trade did this on me
-
Russia urges South Korea to ease tensions and restore peace through diplomacy.
-
Bezes Unveils New Website Version
-
SQLQD has demanded me a $950 “security verification charge”
-
Jiangsu and Zhejiang Bank leads A