Trump's proposal to "take over Gaza" was rejected by all parties.

Recently, U.S. President Trump proposed a plan to take control of the Gaza Strip, suggesting that the U.S. strengthens Israel's security after the Hamas conflict, potentially deploying U.S. troops, and relocating the over two million Gaza residents elsewhere. This proposal has been well received in Israel, where many officials believe it effectively addresses security threats. However, the Arab world has expressed strong opposition to this plan.

Saudi Arabia has stated that U.S. intervention "violates the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people," a position supported by other Middle Eastern countries. The Palestinian Authority has also explicitly rejected Trump's plan, firmly opposing any proposal that would forcibly remove Palestinians from their homes.

The timing of Trump's proposal is quite sensitive, coinciding with ceasefire negotiations, and Arab officials are concerned this could disrupt the ongoing peace process. Palestinians are strongly against any external intervention, and countries like Iran might exploit this issue to exacerbate regional tensions.

Furthermore, Trump's proposal has been met with opposition from international allies. The German Foreign Minister stated that expelling Palestinians violates international law, while France also supports a "two-state solution" and opposes any forced removal of Palestinians from Gaza. Turkey has outright called the proposal "unacceptable."

Although there is support for Trump's proposal within Israel, particularly among far-right politicians, the complexity of the Middle Eastern situation presents significant political hurdles. It remains unclear whether the U.S. and Israel can continue to advance this plan.

The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.