Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Reports say HK's SFC has tentatively approved crypto ETFs.
{Current column}39People have watched
IntroductionCryptocurrencies have never been broadly listed on official trading institutions, forcing investors ...
Cryptocurrencies have Ranking of Global Forex Brokersnever been broadly listed on official trading institutions, forcing investors to trade through third-party platforms, all of which come with security risks. Even Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency trading platform, has faced security issues. However, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong seems poised to make a historic step forward.
Recent media reports suggest that the SFC of Hong Kong is expected to approve the first cryptocurrency ETF by the end of April. Prior to this, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission had already approved 11 Bitcoin spot ETFs. The SFC of Hong Kong has not directly responded to these rumors, merely stating that investment products recognized by the SFC will be publicly listed on its platform.
Although there has been no direct response from the SFC of Hong Kong, several asset management companies have already eagerly announced that their cryptocurrency spot ETFs have been approved by the SFC, making them the first batch of such ETFs in Hong Kong.
ChinaAMC (Hong Kong) announced that it has received approval from the SFC, allowing them to provide investors with virtual asset management services. They now plan to issue ETFs forextrustindex in spot Bitcoin and spot Ethereum, in collaboration with OSL Digital Securities, BOCI UK Prudential Trust, and other institutions.
Harvest Global also announced investments in spot Bitcoin and spot Ethereum, with OSL also partnering with Harvest. Additionally, Bosera Funds (International) and HashKey Capital have announced their virtual asset spot ETFs have been approved by the SFC of Hong Kong.


The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
Prestige Capital Strategies forced me to pay a $980 “account clearance payment”
{Current column}This charge was never disclosed during account setup or funding. Despite completing all required ver ...
Read moreNIESR warns the Bank of England: inflation won't drop below target by 2025.
{Current column}On Wednesday, the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) warned the Bank of Engl ...
Read moreVictim Loses $100,000 in Coiny8v Cryptocurrency Scam: What You Need to Know
{Current column}Cryptocurrency investments have attracted thousands of individuals seeking to profit from volatile m ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Subjective Personal Analysis on Gold for 7/30:
- NIESR warns the Bank of England: inflation won't drop below target by 2025.
- Wells Fargo is expected to pay 1.8 billion dollars to replenish the FDIC fund.
- CrypticBitFx informed me I need to pay a “withdrawal processing fee”
- Canada’s trade deficit rose in September to CAD 1.26 billion, driven by declining exports.
- Global147expertfx demanded a $2,150 “final transaction fee” before processing my withdrawal
Latest articles
-
TradeEasyFX introduced a $2,250 “withdrawal approval cost” out of nowhere on me
-
Real World Finance Trade is asking me to pay a $1,800 “withdrawal integrity verification charge”
-
CrypticBitFx informed me I need to pay a “withdrawal processing fee”
-
CryptoApex blindsided me by introducing a $1,950 “security clearance fee”
-
FusioncoinTrades blocked my withdrawal and asked me for “final compliance fee”
-
Long Asia Launches Cent Account to Empower Indian Traders