Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
South Korea's Constitutional Court rejected Han Duck
{Current column}944People have watched
IntroductionHan Duck-soo, the acting Prime Minister of South Korea, returned to the Seoul government building to ...

Han Duck-soo, the acting Prime Minister of South Korea, returned to the Seoul government building to resume his duties today (March 24) after the Constitutional Court dismissed his impeachment case. The court ruled that the motion to impeach Han Duck-soo was not valid, thus reinstating him as Prime Minister and acting president.
The impeachment case originated on December 27 of last year when the South Korean National Assembly accused Han Duck-soo of assisting President Yoon Seok-youl in declaring a state of emergency during his acting presidency and refusing to appoint three Constitutional Court judges. As a result, a motion to impeach Han Duck-soo was passed, and he was suspended from office. Subsequently, the case was referred to the Constitutional Court to decide whether Han Duck-soo should be removed from office.
After reviewing the case, the Constitutional Court rejected the impeachment motion with a vote of 7 to 1. The court's statement noted that although five judges believed the impeachment motion was valid, there was not enough legal basis to support Han Duck-soo's removal because he had not violated the constitution or laws concerning martial law and rebellion. Two judges opined that the impeachment case was invalid from the start since the parliamentary resolution lacked a two-thirds majority, and only one judge voted in favor of impeachment.
Additionally, the second trial verdict of Lee Jae-myung, the leader of the opposition Democratic Party, accused of violating the Public Officials Election Act, is scheduled to be announced on March 26. At the same time, a decision regarding Yoon Seok-youl's impeachment case may also be forthcoming.

The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
PacWest Bancorp weighing up options including possible sale: Bloomberg By
{Current column}-- is reportedly weighing up its strategic options including a possible a sale amid concerns about ...
Read moreJanuary May Hold the Key to Equity Returns in 2023
{Current column}It's often said that stocks perform well in January as new money enters the marketSmall caps often e ...
Read moreMassive winter storm threatens holiday travel for millions of Americans By Reuters
{Current column}By Tyler CliffordDETROIT (Reuters) -A massive winter storm system enveloped a vast stretch of the Un ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Debt ceiling deal, Fed rate path, Erdogan's victory
- Is DeltaFX Trading Safe? DeltaFX Review
- Stock market today: Dow ends lower as Micron
- Is UTG Markets Trading Safe? UTG Markets Review
- Dollar set for another positive week on raised Fed hike expectations By
- Regional Banks Leading Equities Lower, a Bad Sign for the Economy
Latest articles
-
Oil prices ease on caution over US debt ceiling talks By Reuters
-
JS Link Trading Is Safe? Company Abbreviation JS Link
-
Two equity bankers lose their Morgan Stanley broker licenses
-
Energy, financial stocks lift Wall St after BOJ policy surprise By Reuters
-
Dow futures little changed as investors await corporate earnings By
-
iBiz Trading Is Safe? Company Abbreviation iBiz