The US plans to introduce new tariffs, with April 2nd as a crucial date.

After months of policy chaos, President Trump and his administration are preparing a new round of tariff measures. The White House plans to officially announce this decision on April 2, expecting to impose new import tariffs on several global trade partners, covering industries like automobiles, semiconductors, and pharmaceuticals. Trump has called this date "America's Liberation Day," stating that some goods will face both reciprocal and industry-specific tariffs.

Chaotic Policies and Greer's Adjustments

Over the past two months, U.S. tariff policies have been full of uncertainty, with implementation dates changing repeatedly and policy communications in disarray. Trump's frequent threats of sanctions and subsequent rapid reversals have left markets confused. During this time, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer was largely absent from the public eye, with his appointment confirmed only in late February. Until then, White House advisor Peter Navarro and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick handled policy communication.

Greer, a former deputy to Trump's first-term trade advisor Robert Lighthizer, is known for his calm demeanor and legal acumen. Insiders reveal he is trying to restore policy processes within the U.S. Trade Representative’s office and will play a crucial role in the tariff decision on April 2. Currently, the USTR is publicly soliciting feedback to provide formal channels for businesses and stakeholders. This approach marks a shift from previous tariff measures on Canada, Mexico, and metal products.

Uncertainties in Tariff Plans and Implementation

The Trump administration plans to devise new import tax rates based on other countries' tariffs and trade barriers against U.S. goods, though specific details remain unsettled. Discussions within the government involve using a uniform tariff formula, adjusting according to each country's average tariff levels. However, insiders suggest that the final tariffs might still be influenced by Trump's personal stance towards each country, depending on "friendly" or "adversarial" relations.

It remains unclear when these new tariffs will be enacted. Some measures might take effect immediately on April 2, while others could await weeks or even months of investigation and evaluation. Commerce Secretary Lutnick stated that some tariffs might be phased in over a longer period to allow industries and markets time to adapt.

Legal Challenges and Policy Risks

The Trump administration plans to use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) as the legal basis for implementing tariffs, which may face litigation risks. This law is primarily used for addressing national emergencies, and its applicability to tariff measures is questionable. Some legal experts believe that if Trump uses the IEEPA to impose tariffs on North American goods, it could face challenges in court, especially if tariffs are linked to immigration and drug trafficking issues.

Insiders reveal that the Trump team is weighing the legal risks of IEEPA while considering political and economic impacts in tariff plan formulation. A key advantage of IEEPA is its ability to bypass Congress, allowing quick implementation of tariffs, which Trump may leverage to expedite policy enforcement.

Outlook: Tariffs May Reshape Global Trade Dynamics

Although the Trump administration has yet to make a final decision, April 2 is seen as a crucial date for trade policy adjustments. Insiders say some White House officials and advisors see this as the last chance to recalibrate strategy, enabling the government to focus on larger challenges.

Due to the uncertainty of tariff policies, market sentiment remains tense as businesses wait for the U.S. government's final decision. This may lead to significant changes in the global trade landscape, with investors and governments closely monitoring the April 2 announcement and its subsequent effects.

The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.