Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Trudeau: Trump has genuine intentions to annex Canada
{Current column}27People have watched
IntroductionCanadian Prime Minister Trudeau expressed concerns during a closed-door meeting on February 7 with b ...

Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau expressed concerns during a closed-door meeting on February 7 with business leaders about the intentions of the Trump administration, suggesting that Trump may genuinely wish to annex Canada to acquire its abundant natural resources. Trudeau highlighted that the U.S. government is aware of the critical mineral resources Canada possesses, which could be one of the real reasons behind Trump's proposal to annex Canada.
Previously, Trump had repeatedly mentioned the idea of incorporating Canada into the United States. Although Canadian officials initially dismissed it as a joke, Trudeau explicitly pointed out this time that such remarks might reflect the true intentions of the Trump administration. He emphasized, "The U.S. wants to benefit from the resources we have, and annexing Canada might be seen as their most direct method."
Trudeau stated that Canada needs to prepare for potential trade challenges and expand more opportunities in international markets. He stressed that although Canada has interests and faces challenges in trade with the United States, under the threat of Trump’s tariff policies, Canada still needs to firmly maintain its position.
Additionally, Trudeau mentioned that if the U.S. continues to impose tariffs, Canada will take reciprocal measures, but the goal remains to lift these sanctions swiftly and find a new balance point in the long-term political and economic relationship. He also called for Canada to strengthen its external trade strategies in the coming months to enhance economic resilience to face potential long-term challenges from the U.S.


The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
Oil giants fear Middle East conflict, expect rising demand, adding energy transition pressure.
{Current column}Amid the current global economic uncertainties, senior executives of oil companies are collectively ...
Read moreApex Orbit just added a new condition: pay a $1,650 “regulatory re
{Current column}How convenient. They wait until I make profits, then pile on sudden costs. They gave no documentatio ...
Read moreCoin Market Master said I need to make a “final payment” of $3,000 before withdrawing.
{Current column}They told me I need to pay a “final payment” of $3,000 before I can withdraw my funds. I don’t under ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- kriskopy imposed a $1,860 “security audit fee” , anyone met this? I need help
- Axmarketsignal claimed I need to pay a “fund recovery fee” before I can withdraw my money.
- “liquidity verification fee”? BitStockTrades surprised me by introducing this?
- TradesHorizon is now telling me I owe a $1,800 “final audit charge”
- CloudtradesFX informed me that I can not make withdrawal
- Dynamix is saying I need to pay a “liquidity charge” before I can access my funds. Is that standard?
Latest articles
-
Rotabit Applies Advanced Network Technology
-
Vennan Trade said I need to pay a ‘fund clearance fee’ before I can withdraw my money.
-
Trade Current Pro demands a $950 'legal endorsement fee'—is this legit?
-
AllianceCryptoFXTrade told me today that I need to pay a $2,400 “liquidity adjustment fee.”
-
Korean semiconductor production falls as AI demand slows; Samsung profits miss expectations.
-
OffizielleKryptoBorse blocked my $2,100 withdrawal