Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Trump demands greater concessions from Ukraine in new agreement.
{Current column}973People have watched
IntroductionThe Trump administration is exerting greater pressure by proposing a new draft economic agreement th ...

The Trump administration is exerting greater pressure by proposing a new draft economic agreement that requires Ukraine to make more significant concessions in return for U.S. aid. The draft demands Ukraine to relinquish profits from future economic projects to offset the financial and military assistance provided by the U.S. since the conflict began in 2022. Ukrainian MP Yaroslav Zheleznyak publicly discussed the draft’s contents in a YouTube video and noted that passing the draft would be particularly challenging, especially when it comes to approval by the Ukrainian parliament.
The draft requires Ukraine to remit not only profits from mineral projects but also from oil and gas resources, impacting both state-owned and private enterprises. Unlike the previous framework agreement negotiated between Kyiv and Washington, the new version significantly increases the demands on Ukraine. This agreement was originally intended to be signed by Ukrainian President Zelensky and Trump before their meeting on February 28th.
The new draft would not only impose a substantial financial responsibility on Ukraine but could also affect the country's resource development and economic prospects. The amount requested by the Trump administration varies according to different estimates; Ukraine estimates U.S. aid at $100 billion, while Trump has repeatedly mentioned a figure of $350 billion. Trump demands Ukraine use the revenue from these resource projects to compensate for previous U.S. aid to maintain ongoing support.
This draft reflects stronger U.S. pressure on Ukraine, but the Ukrainian side has expressed concerns that the passage of this agreement could face significant challenges.

The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
Honda's Prologue SUV sees strong sales and loyalty, challenging Tesla's market share.
{Current column}In the three months ending September 30, Honda's first electric mid-size SUV, the Prologue, sol ...
Read moreSQLQD has demanded me a $950 “security verification charge”
{Current column}This fee was never mentioned during registration or anywhere in their terms. Despite completing full ...
Read moreFusioncoinTrades blocked my withdrawal and asked me for “final compliance fee”
{Current column}I was never told about this charge during onboarding or trading. After submitting all verification d ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Lebanon's GDP may fall 9% due to the conflict, and the UN urges more aid.
- [Morning Market] Inflation Pressure Eases, Major Event Tonight
- UnlimitedTradeFX askedme to pay a $2,300 to release my withdrawal funds.
- Shanghai's new property policy eases restrictions, boosting home
- Tariff pressures may drive South Korea to boost U.S. investments amid Trump’s policies.
- Subjective Personal Analysis on Gold for 7/30:
Latest articles
-
Trump's "Super Week" boosts U.S. stocks; inflation trades and small
-
[Early Trade] Slight Cooling in Demand, Gold Prices Continue to Fluctuate
-
Personal Analysis of Gold on August 1:
-
The U.S. Justice Department introduces new rules to limit foreign access to sensitive data.
-
China's steel exports are set to stay high in 2025, heightening global trade friction risks.
-
SilverFx24Option unexpectedly demanded a $1,900 “final payout clearance fee”