Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Tesla refuses to pay Musk the highest salary, board criticized for close ties with him.
{Current column}41People have watched
IntroductionProxy advisory firm Glass Lewis said on Saturday that it recommended Tesla shareholders reject a $56 ...
Proxy advisory firm Glass Lewis said on How is Huangma ForexSaturday that it recommended Tesla shareholders reject a $56 billion compensation plan for CEO Elon Musk, which, if approved, would be the largest CEO compensation in U.S. corporate history.
The report cited reasons for opposition, including the "excessive scale" of the compensation plan, the dilutive effect after exercising, and ownership concentration. It also mentioned Musk's "time-consuming projects," which have increased due to his high-profile acquisition of Twitter (now called X).
The compensation plan was proposed by Tesla's board, which has been frequently criticized for its close ties with the billionaire. The plan includes no salary or cash bonus but relies on Tesla's market value growing to $650 billion between 2018 and 2028 as the target for rewards. Currently, the company's market value is approximately $571.6 billion, according to LSEG data.
In January, Delaware Court of Chancery Judge Kathaleen McCormick struck down the initial compensation plan. Subsequently, Musk attempted to move Tesla's headquarters from Delaware to Texas.
Glass Lewis also criticized the proposed move to Texas, arguing that it presents "uncertain benefits and additional risks" for shareholders.
Tesla urged shareholders to reaffirm their approval of the compensation plan.
This month, Tesla Board Chair Robyn Denholm told the Financial Times that Musk deserves the compensation plan because the company has achieved ambitious revenue and stock price targets.
Musk became Tesla’s CEO in 2008. In recent years, he has helped the company turn a $2.2 billion loss in 2018 into a $15 billion profit and has increased vehicle production sevenfold, according to online voting site Vote Tesla.
Additionally, the proxy advisory firm recommended shareholders vote against the re-election of board member Kimbal Musk (Musk's brother) while supporting the re-election of former 21st Century Fox CEO James Murdoch.


The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
Trump has secured 270 votes, clinching the victory.
{Current column}In the 2024 U.S. presidential election, Republican candidate Trump secured victory by achieving 270 ...
Read moreZERO Markets is now refusing to release my funds unless I pay a $1,600 “exit processing fee.”
{Current column}That’s not a fee I agreed to. It wasn’t in their documentation, and it was never brought up before. ...
Read moreFxBennyLtd now says I must pay a $1,700 “release access fee” to complete my withdrawal.
{Current column}I have reviewed all the documents and agreements—they never mentioned such a fee. I complied with ev ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- U.S. CPI release: Can gold's correction shift? Market watches inflation.
- Live Smart Trade informed me today that I must pay a $1,700 “fund release fee”
- Eclipse Macro has suddenly demanded a $2,080 “international compliance fee”
- LinxVista is refusing to process my payout unless I pay a $2,100 “manual fund disbursement fee.”
- The truth of the deal you have been desperately seeking can be summed up in eight words.
- Eclipse Macro has suddenly demanded a $2,080 “international compliance fee”
Latest articles
-
Canada’s trade deficit rose in September to CAD 1.26 billion, driven by declining exports.
-
Axmarketsignal said I can’t access my funds unless I pay a “risk control reserve fee” of $1,850
-
Zen TradingsFX claims I owe a $1,640 "fund release authorization charge"
-
Rise Trade introduced a new $1,900 charge just when I thought I was finally getting my money.
-
$1,060 security audit was charged on me, why? Copy Express Trade did this on me
-
Prolifics Market just told me I need to cover a $1,850 “cross