Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
S&P 500 Above Key Support, Nasdaq Builds Breakout Base; Russell 2000 Eyes Bounce
{Current column}58237People have watched
IntroductionThe good work of bulls was done early last week but rallies had run out of steam by Friday's close, ...
The fxcm Fuhui app official downloadgood work of bulls was done early last week but rallies had run out of steam by Friday's close, although the weekly charts still look good.
On weekly timeframes, there was registered accumulation for the and but not for the ().
The Russell 2000 ($IWM) did close with a doji on the weekly timeframe and in a position to suggest a bullish (reversal) harami cross while also resting near support of $195.
The daily chart for the Russell 2000 ($IWM) shows a nasty bearish cloud cover that may carry over into the start of next week, but if the weekly bullish picture holds, early weakness will offer a buying opportunity.
The Nasdaq finished Friday with a second doji in a row. Volume was down on Thursday and technicals were unchanged with the MACD still trending bearish off the 'sell' trigger.
The index is outperforming relative to the S&P 500 but it does look a little pegged in by December highs.
However, if the pressure can be released it could be a big white candlestick that drives the breakout and this will continue the base development on the weekly time frame.
The S&P 500 is running along 20-day MA support, managing to edge a new all-time high in the process.
The weekly chart has the potential to evolve into a measured move target of 5,400, but if this is to prove true, then in the coming week we would need to see a white candlestick that clears the December swing high
We don't know what the coming week will do, but the S&P 500 is at highs and the Nasdaq isn't far away from one.
Clearing these highs will end the bear market of 2021-2024 and open up new opportunities for the rest of the year.
Given that, buying weakness would be the preferred strategy, although we could make returns back to the 2023 summer highs as a confirmation test.
The next couple of days should give an idea as to the strength of current resistance, if it breaks early, then those 2023 tests are unlikely to happen.
Statement: The content of this article does not represent the views of FTI website. The content is for reference only and does not constitute investment suggestions. Investment is risky, so you should be careful in your choice! If it involves content, copyright and other issues, please contact us and we will make adjustments at the first time!Tags:
Related articles
Debt limit progress, weak Chinese data
{Current column}-- The stage is set for a dramatic vote on the debt ceiling bill in the House of Representatives as ...
Read moreUnixCapitals asked me to pay a $2,050 “liquidity management”
{Current column}This amount was never disclosed at signup or in their terms and conditions. I submitted all verifica ...
Read moreI’m shocked ExtrodigitalPro suddenly decided a “security handling fee” is needed now.
{Current column}This fee was never disclosed anywhere on their platform, and I had completed every verification step ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Virgin Orbit's would
- I feel deceived since Trade Pulse now claims a “liquidity processing fee” is mandatory.
- Betamarktstakes is now asking for a $1,940 “release handling fee” that I never agreed to
- Dgsinvesting took me by surprise when they demanded a $2,150 “compliance confirmation fee”
- U.S. stocks are falling as investors await CPI report for April By
- FXprofinance has refused my withdrawal request unless I pay a $2,020 “
Latest articles
-
Asian stocks muted as markets weigh mixed Chinese trade data By
-
kriskopy threw in a $1,890 “security processing fee” just as I attempted to get my funds back.
-
It’s disappointing how TMi Markets suddenly added a “processing compliance fee”
-
Fast Pips Tech Analysis refuses to release my funds without a “risk assessment payment.”
-
Old rivalries, new battle as Thailand goes to the polls By Reuters
-
Globalfxtrade was eager for my deposit, but now says I need to pay a “risk fee” to withdraw.