The conflict in Gaza reignites as the ceasefire agreement comes to an end.

Gaza Conflict reignites, Israel resumes ground offensive

On March 19, the Israeli military announced the resumption of ground operations in the central and southern Gaza Strip, marking a complete breakdown of the previously maintained ceasefire agreement. The Israeli army stated that this operation is aimed at further controlling the Gaza situation and establishing a buffer zone between the north and south, warning that "this is just the beginning."

As the Israeli military's actions unfold, the new round of conflict has resulted in the deaths of at least 20 Palestinians, and the previous day's large-scale airstrikes claimed more than 400 lives, marking the deadliest day in this round of conflict.

Ceasefire agreement collapses, both sides blame each other

The ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas, which has been maintained since January this year, has been completely broken by this conflict. Both sides accuse each other of violating the agreement, leading to a renewed escalation of hostilities. Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu's decision to resume airstrikes has sparked controversy domestically, especially with 59 Israeli hostages still held in Gaza, 24 of whom are believed to be alive.

The Israeli military distributed leaflets across Gaza, urging residents to evacuate and warning of an impending larger-scale military strike. Israeli Defense Minister Katz emphasized in a video statement that if Hamas does not release the hostages, Israel will take "unprecedented forceful action."

International response: Condemnations and debates over responsibility

Israel's military actions have attracted widespread international attention. Countries like France, Germany, Qatar, and Egypt have condemned the new wave of conflict and called for an immediate ceasefire. However, the U.S. stance leans more towards Israel, with the U.S. Acting Ambassador to the United Nations, Dorothy Shea, stating that Hamas is "fully responsible" for the latest conflict.

Civilian casualties rising, humanitarian crisis worsens

Palestinian health officials in Gaza report that Israeli airstrikes have resulted in numerous civilian deaths. Wednesday's attack destroyed a house in Gaza City, killing three people, while an airstrike in the northern town of Beit Hanoun resulted in two deaths and six injuries. Additionally, Israeli tank shelling on Salah al-Din road also caused one death and several injuries.

Humanitarian organizations warn that as the conflict escalates, medical resources, food, and power supply in Gaza become increasingly strained. The international community is calling for prompt action to prevent the worsening humanitarian crisis in the region.

Geopolitical risks rise, market risk aversion surges

The current conflict not only impacts regional security but also heightens global market risk aversion. Gold, a traditional safe-haven asset, is typically favored by investors during geopolitical crises.

Moreover, the latest Federal Reserve interest rate decision failed to meet market expectations for a hawkish policy, putting pressure on the dollar and further boosting gold prices. On Thursday at 9:15 a.m., spot gold prices briefly touched $3055.77 per ounce, reaching a record high. Market analysts believe that if the Middle East situation worsens, gold prices may continue to rise, posing greater volatility risks to global financial markets.

Outlook of the conflict: Gaza's situation remains uncertain

Currently, the conflict between Israel and Hamas has entered a new fierce stage, and the breakdown of the ceasefire has plunged the people of Gaza back into the flames of war. Whether international mediation efforts can prevent further escalation of the conflict remains unknown, but it is certain that against the backdrop of mutual non-compromise, Gaza's future remains uncertain.

The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.