Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
RTX unit discusses ending NASA contract, planned new space station suits
{Current column}84People have watched
IntroductionAccording to two informed sources, Collins Aerospace, a subsidiary of RTX Corporation, is in discuss ...
According to two informed sources,Anda Forex platform withdrawal rejected Collins Aerospace, a subsidiary of RTX Corporation, is in discussions with NASA to exit its contract for manufacturing new spacesuits for astronauts on the International Space Station. This development is a setback for NASA, which has been struggling with its decades-old spacewalking suits.
The contract is part of a $3.5 billion project awarded by NASA to Collins and Axiom Space in 2022, aimed at developing new spacesuits for the International Space Station and future lunar missions. Collins initially received $97 million in funding for the development of the space station suits and was eligible to compete with Axiom for additional funding to develop lunar suits.
However, Collins has not made satisfactory progress on the project and has fallen behind schedule. According to the two informed sources, Collins has been discussing with NASA officials how to conclude its role in the project.
In a statement, a spokesperson for Collins said, "After a comprehensive evaluation, Collins Aerospace and NASA have mutually agreed to reduce the Exploration Extravehicular Activity Services (xEVAS) task order." This refers to the spacesuit contract.
NASA has not commented on the matter yet.
NASA has historically faced numerous difficulties in modernizing humanoid space apparatuses, and the spacesuit issue is just one part of the larger challenge. These bulky and complex systems are the tools used by American astronauts for routine maintenance outside the International Space Station, which orbits roughly 250 miles (400 kilometers) above Earth and is comparable in size to a football field laboratory.


The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
GlobeInvestFX required me to pay a $980 account clearance payment
{Current column}This cost was never disclosed during signup or verification. Despite completing all procedures, this ...
Read moreWorldQuest FX has demanded I pay a $2,100 “payment authentication levy”
{Current column}This came out of nowhere. I had already completed every single requirement weeks ago. My documents w ...
Read moreHenchman Trade introduced a $2,000 “liquidity certification fee” before I can make my withdrawal.
{Current column}I’ve already gone through their lengthy verification process, which included submitting bank stateme ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- In early trading, the three major central banks discuss rates. Short
- Viciation has demanded a $1,750 “compliance synchronization charge”
- Findriventrade is now demanding a $2,050 “final document verification fee”
- Admiralholdings now requires a $1,700 “final account activation fee” before releasing my funds.
- Firstgaininvestments unexpectedly introduced a $2,200 “withdrawal clearance surcharge”
- Swiftrine Options says I owe a $2,200 “withdrawal license tax” before I can access my balance.
Latest articles
-
The Brazilian government advances spending controls to stabilize finances and ease budget pressure.
-
Tickmill now wants me to pay a $2,100 "account activation fee" before releasing my funds.
-
Primetradeoption has told me that I need to pay a $1,750 "account clearance fee"
-
Tickmill now wants me to pay a $2,100 "account activation fee" before releasing my funds.
-
SQLQD has demanded me a $950 “security verification charge”
-
Out of the blue, FernCapital Trades introduced a $1,900 “liquidity audit tax”