Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
US Senate approves Social Security change despite fiscal concerns By Reuters
{Current column}6924People have watched
IntroductionBy Bo EricksonWASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Congress early on Saturday passed a measure to boost S ...
By Bo Erickson
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The FXCM foreign exchange platformU.S. Congress early on Saturday passed a measure to boost Social Security retirement payments to some retirees who draw public pensions - such as former police and firefighters - which critics warned will further weaken the program's finances.

The Senate in a 76-20 bipartisan vote shortly after midnight approved the Social Security Fairness Act, which would repeal two-decades-old provisions that can reduce benefits for people who also receive a pension.
The House of Representatives last month approved the bill in a 327-75 vote, which means that Senate approval sends it to Democratic President Joe Biden to sign into law. The White House did not immediately respond to a question about whether Biden intended to do so.
The bill will overturn a decades-old change to the program that had been made to limit federal benefits to some higher-earning workers with pensions. Over time, growing numbers of municipal employees such as firefighters and postal workers also saw their payments capped.
Most Americans do not participate in pension plans, which pay a defined benefit, and instead are dependent on what money they can save and Social Security. Just one in ten U.S. private sector workers have pension plans, according to Labor Department data.
The new provisions impact about 3% of Social Security beneficiaries - totaling a little more than 2.5 million Americans - and the workers and retirees affected by these provisions are key constituencies for lawmakers and their powerful advocacy groups have pushed for a legislative fix.
Some of them could received hundreds of dollars more a month in federal benefits as a result of the bill, retirement experts said.
Some federal budget experts warned the change could hurt the program's already shaky finances as the bill's price tag is approximately $196 billion over the next decade, according to an analysis by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office.
Emerson (NYSE:) Sprick, associate director of economic policy at the Bipartisan Policy Center, said in an interview, "the fact that there is such overwhelming support in Congress for exactly the opposite of what policy researchers agree on is pretty frustrating."
Instead of scrapping the current formulas for determining retirement benefits for these workers, revisions have been floated, as well as more accurate communication from the Social Security Administration on how much money these public sector employees should expect.
The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonpartisan fiscal think tank, is also warning the extra cost will affect the program's future.
"We are racing to our own fiscal demise," the group's president, Maya MacGuineas, said in a statement.
"It is truly astonishing that at a time when we are just nine years away from the trust fund for the nation’s largest program being completely exhausted, lawmakers are about to consider speeding that up by six months."
Republican Senator Ted Cruz on the Senate floor on Wednesday said the bill as written will "throw granny over the cliff".
"Every senator who votes to impose $200 billion dollars of cost on the Social Security Trust Fund, you are choosing to sacrifice the interest of seniors who paid into Social Security and who earned those benefits," he said.
Bill supporters said Social Security's future can be addressed at a later time.

Asked about the solvency implications of this legislation, Democratic Senator Michael Bennet, a supporter of the bill, told Reuters: "Those are much longer term issues that we have to find a way to address together."
(This story has been refiled to fix a typographical error in paragraph 17)
Statement: The content of this article does not represent the views of FTI website. The content is for reference only and does not constitute investment suggestions. Investment is risky, so you should be careful in your choice! If it involves content, copyright and other issues, please contact us and we will make adjustments at the first time!
Tags:
Related articles
European stocks lower; banking worries continue to weigh By
{Current column}- European stock markets traded lower Wednesday, with worries about the health of the global banking ...
Read moreNetflix reports, Johnson & Johnson, bank earnings: 3 things to watch By
{Current column}By Liz Moyer-- Stocks were rising heading into the close on Monday after a choppy day of trading as ...
Read moreGold hovers below $2,000 as rate hike jitters increase By
{Current column}By Ambar Warrick-- Gold prices traded below key levels on Thursday, coming under pressure from a res ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Dominion Energy, National Grid pursuing pipeline sales
- Wall St eyes higher open as inflation data eases rate
- Several Fed officials considered rate pause in March, but ultimately agreed to hike By Reuters
- US housing market stabilizing as single
- 'Big Short' investor Michael Burry says he was 'wrong' to tell investors to sell By
- JPMorgan rallies as results crush estimates; boosts NII forecast By
Latest articles
-
Amid banking woes, faltering US small
-
Dollar rebounds from one
-
Dow futures edge higher but recession concerns limit gains By
-
Netflix Q1 Earnings Preview: What Are the Stock's Fundamentals Telling Us?
-
4 big analyst picks: Snap gets a fresh upgrade; a big day for Tencent Music By
-
U.S. shares with European banks ways Russia is evading sanctions By Reuters