Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
U.S. charges Archegos founder Hwang with fraud alleging 'brazen scheme' By Reuters
{Current column}62127People have watched
Introduction2/2© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: 888 7th Ave, a building that reportedly houses Archegos Capital is picture ...

By Jody Godoy
(Reuters) - Federal prosecutors have charged the owner of Archegos Capital Management Bill Hwang with racketeering and fraud as regulators said his manipulation of stock prices cost banks billions of dollars when his "house of cards" collapsed, according to documents released on Wednesday.
Archegos, a family office run by former Tiger Asia manager Hwang, defaulted on margin calls in March of last year, leaving big name banks nursing heavy losses and sparking a fire sale of shares including ViacomCBS (NASDAQ:PARA) and Discovery (NASDAQ:WBD) Inc.
The blowup cost global banks including Credit Suisse (SIX:CSGN), Nomura Holdings (NYSE:NMR), Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS) and Deutsche Bank (ETR:DBKGn) more than $10 billion in losses.
Prosecutors allege that Hwang, who denies wrongdoing, manipulated the stock price of seven of Archegos' portfolio companies, including Viacom, Discovery and Tencent Music Entertainment, according to an indictment brought by the U.S. Attorney's office in Manhattan.
A lawyer for Hwang said in a statement the case had "absolutely no factual or legal basis."
Prosecutors say Hwang did so by deliberately misleading counterparties about the positions Archegos held and controlling the timing and size of trades to have a greater impact on price, the indictment said.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission separately brought a complaint.
"Archegos engaged in a brazen scheme to manipulate the market," the SEC said. "Eventually, the weight of Defendants’ fraudulent and manipulative scheme was too much for Archegos to bear, and over the course of less than a week in late March 2021, the house of cards collapsed."
Prosecutors said that Hwang and the family office's former chief financial officer, Patrick Halligan "corrupted the operations and activities" of the family office to manipulate the price of stocks it held and lied to banks and brokerages, which lost billions on trades.
The SEC said it had sued Hwang, Halligan, head trader William Tomita, and Chief Risk Officer Scott Becker for their alleged roles in the scheme.
"As you will see when the facts unfold, Bill Hwang is entirely innocent of any wrongdoing; there is no evidence whatsoever that he committed any kind of crime, let alone the overblown allegations that pervade this indictment," the lawyer, Lawrence S. Lustberg, said in a statement. He said that Hwang had previously fully cooperated with the government.
“Pat Halligan is innocent and will be exonerated," a lawyer for Halligan said.
Attorneys for Becker and Tomita did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
SEC enforcement director Gurbir Grewal said Hwang and the firm "propped up a $36 billion house of cards by engaging in a constant cycle of manipulative trading, lying to banks to obtain additional capacity, and then using that capacity to engage in still more manipulative trading."
U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco are scheduled to hold a news conference on the charges on Wednesday morning.
Hwang built up leverage by using derivatives known as total return swaps from major Wall Street banks. The trades allow investors to bet on stock price moves without owning the underlying securities. Instead, the bank buys the stocks and promises the investor a performance-related return. The client, in turn, posts collateral to secure the trades with the bank.
The swaps allowed Hwang to hide his positions and evade regulatory scrutiny, the SEC said.
Family offices are private funds that manage the wealth of individuals. Single family offices have few regulatory requirements.
(The story refiles to say "on Wednesday" instead of "on Monday" for timing of news conference, paragraph 15.)
Statement: The content of this article does not represent the views of FTI website. The content is for reference only and does not constitute investment suggestions. Investment is risky, so you should be careful in your choice! If it involves content, copyright and other issues, please contact us and we will make adjustments at the first time!
Tags:
Related articles
Australia retail sales level off in Feb as shoppers rein in spending By Reuters
{Current column}By Stella QiuSYDNEY (Reuters) - Australian retail sales levelled off in February after wild swings a ...
Read moreCherry Finance Trading Is Safe? Company Abbreviation Cherry Finance
{Current column}FTI's top 100 foreign exchange brokers can be selected by reference. If they are not within 100, ...
Read moreBlast hits Crimea bridge crucial to Russia's war By Reuters
{Current column}NG-5.22%Add to/Remove from WatchlistAdd to Watchlist Add PositionBy Max Hunder and Jonathan LandayKY ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Dollar edges higher, yen slumps after dovish BOJ meeting By
- HMT Group Trading Is Safe? Company Abbreviation HMT Group
- Orin Markets Trading Is Safe? Company Abbreviation Orin Markets
- Gardala Wealth Trading Is Safe? Company Abbreviation Gardala Wealth
- Ukraine furious over Russian UN Security Council presidency By Reuters
- PowerTrend Trading Is Safe? Company Abbreviation PowerTrend
Latest articles
-
Oil pushes higher on massive U.S. inventory draw, economic fears linger By
-
3 Quality Dividend Stocks For A Lifetime Of Returns
-
Chart Of The Day: Will OPEC Production Cuts Drive Exxon Stock Higher?
-
A Partial Recovery For Global Markets Last Week
-
US House votes to repeal Biden solar tariff waiver By Reuters
-
SOD Global Trading Is Safe? Company Abbreviation SOD Global