Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Controversy Surrounds the "Beautiful Act," Economists Remain Skeptical
{Current column}73People have watched
IntroductionWhite House Promotes: Economy Will "Explode with Growth"On the eve of Independence Day, th ...
White House Promotes: Economy Will "Explode with Growth"
On the eve of Independence Day,Top ten traders on mt4 the Trump administration's "The Great Beautiful Act" has captured the attention of both political and market arenas. The White House insists that this so-called "largest-ever" tax bill will recreate the economic miracle of the 2017 tax cuts, predicting a short-term GDP growth rate of 4.2% to 5.2%, far exceeding the current official forecast of 1.8%.
President Trump stated on social media that the bill would increase the U.S. economic growth rate to "threefold or fivefold." Senior Republicans have also echoed this sentiment, claiming the bill will bring dual prosperity of capital investment and employment. The White House Council of Economic Advisers supports this forecast, emphasizing the historically proven stimulative effects of tax cuts on economic growth.
Academia Refutes: Growth "Beautiful," But Limited in Strength
However, facing the White House's optimistic estimates, various independent institutions and economists have raised objections, arguing that the policy's effects are significantly exaggerated. The model from Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania shows that ten-year GDP growth only increases by 0.4 percentage points, almost negligible. The Tax Foundation's analysis also concludes that the bill can only boost long-term growth by 0.8%, with revenue offsetting the cost ratio less than one-third.
More noteworthy, the Joint Committee on Taxation points out that the tax returns from the economic growth triggered by the bill account for less than 3% of the total cost. The Yale Budget Lab predicts that after growth accelerates to 2%, it will be countered by debt expansion.
Former Biden administration economic adviser Kimberly Clausing stated bluntly: "If the Republican plan fails, it might actually be the best outcome for the U.S. economy."
Fiscal Risks Rise, Deficit Pressures Highlighted
The Congressional Budget Office warns that "The Great Beautiful Act" will add $2.4 trillion to the U.S. fiscal deficit over the next decade. With the current deficit at its highest in years and the continued upward pressure on interest rates, the additional fiscal burden is undoubtedly a further challenge to the sustainability of federal finance.
Although White House economic advisers argue that after the 2017 tax cuts, the federal tax-to-GDP ratio did not decline significantly, several studies suggest that the policy at the time did not "pay for itself" as expected, but instead expanded the deficit.
Tariff Shadows Dampen Confidence, Investors Wait and See
Meanwhile, economists point out that even if tax cuts bring incentive effects, the high tariff policy implemented by the Trump administration remains an uncertain factor in economic prospects. Morgan Stanley's Chief Economist Seth Carpenter noted that tariff uncertainties weaken corporate confidence, and even if tax cuts allow immediate deduction of capital expenditures, "without tariff certainty, companies will not act rashly."
This raises questions about the actual effect of the highly anticipated bill in promoting long-term structural economic investment.
A Significant Gap Remains Between Policy Vision and Real Effects
Even before "The Great Beautiful Act" is passed, it has already become one of the most controversial topics in Washington politics. On one side is the Republican-led optimism, while on the other is the economic community's sober analysis depicting a moderate or even limited growth outlook. Whether this bill is an economic booster or a fiscal risk remains to be seen over time.
Risk Warning and DisclaimerThe market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
UBS predicts silver to hit $38 by 2025, driven by demand and gold
{Current column}The latest UBS report indicates that while gold prices have repeatedly hit new highs, silver prices ...
Read moreWhat is a Balanced Fund? What issues do we need to understand about Balanced Funds?
{Current column}What is a Balanced Fund?A Balanced Fund is a type of investment fund aimed at maintaining a balanced ...
Read moreWhat is a backorder? It's processing orders for items that are currently out of stock.
{Current column}What is a BackorderA backorder refers to a situation in the sales process where a customer places an ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- China's steel exports are set to stay high in 2025, heightening global trade friction risks.
- What is the Balanced Scorecard? What do we know about the Balanced Scorecard?
- What is time value? What types are there and what influences it?
- What is Dark Cloud Cover? What to note about this pattern?
- Israel kills Hamas leader, gold prices hit historical highs due to geopolitical risks.
- What is Bancassurance? What issues should we be aware of regarding bancassurance?
Latest articles
-
New accounts at FOREX.com can receive up to $5000 in bonuses.
-
What is Bank Capital? What issues should we pay attention to regarding bank capital?
-
What is bad debt expense? It involves origin, calculation, and ways to reduce it.
-
What is an Inverse Head and Shoulders? How is the pattern confirmed? How long to form?
-
Honda's Prologue SUV sees strong sales and loyalty, challenging Tesla's market share.
-
What is a Double Option? What do we need to know about Double Options?