Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
US prosecutors suggest criminal charges against Boeing for breaching settlement deal.
{Current column}21People have watched
IntroductionAccording to two individuals familiar with the matter, U.S. prosecutors have recommended that senior ...
According to two individuals familiar with the matter,What software do you use for foreign exchange trading? U.S. prosecutors have recommended that senior officials of the Justice Department pursue criminal charges against Boeing, alleging that the aircraft manufacturer violated a settlement agreement related to two fatal crashes.
The Justice Department must decide whether to prosecute Boeing by July 7. The prosecutors' recommendation had not been previously reported.
In May of this year, officials determined that Boeing had breached a 2021 agreement. That agreement was intended to shield Boeing from criminal conspiracy and fraud charges stemming from the deadly crashes involving 737 MAX aircraft in 2018 and 2019.
Under the 2021 agreement, the Justice Department agreed not to prosecute Boeing for defrauding the Federal Aviation Administration, provided that Boeing improved its compliance measures and submitted regular reports. Boeing also agreed to pay $2.5 billion to resolve the investigation.
Boeing declined to comment on this matter. The company had previously stated that it has "complied" with the terms of the 2021 settlement, which was a three-year deferred prosecution agreement. Boeing informed the Justice Department that it disagreed with the department's determination of a breach, Reuters reported this month.
A spokesperson for the Justice Department also declined to comment.
According to the two sources, discussions are ongoing about a possible resolution, but there is no guarantee that officials will file charges. The internal discussions within the Justice Department are still in progress and no final decision has been made.


The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
Canada’s trade deficit rose in September to CAD 1.26 billion, driven by declining exports.
{Current column}Canada's trade deficit in September exceeded market expectations, reaching 1.26 billion CAD (ab ...
Read moreOffizielleKryptoBorse blocked my $2,100 withdrawal
{Current column}Despite completing all KYC and receiving approval weeks earlier, this new fee suddenly appeared. I r ...
Read more“liquidity verification fee”? BitStockTrades surprised me by introducing this?
{Current column}The fee was never disclosed during onboarding or in any official communication. My account was fully ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- [Breaking News] Macro Bullion
- ZercotTrades is demanding I pay a “legal fee” before I can withdraw my funds. What should I do?
- BitBrokerPro told me I need to pay a “data verification surcharge.” Should I be worried?
- Does anybody who knows how to get my money back from StockOptionTrade?
- TradeEasyFX introduced a $2,250 “withdrawal approval cost” out of nowhere on me
- DesupercoinTrade told me I need to pay for “account verification” before I can access my funds.
Latest articles
-
HorizonCapitalMarket surprised me by introducing a $1,880 “liquidity management charge”
-
crypfininvestment froze my balance after I asked to close my account. What can I do?
-
I thought Meta Premium Markets was legit, but now they’ve disabled my login
-
Anyone else asked to download a third
-
TrustVest Capital required me a $2,000 “risk management surcharge”
-
coinespert said my account was “temporarily suspended” after I requested a withdrawal.