您现在的位置是:Forex Dealer Reviews >>正文
Powell suggests that if inflation is controlled, there may be an early interest rate cut.
Forex Dealer Reviews2人已围观
简介The Fed Remains Watchful: Inflation Trajectory is Key to Policy AdjustmentsFederal Reserve Chair Jer ...
The Foreign electrical retailers are in a wave of bankruptcyFed Remains Watchful: Inflation Trajectory is Key to Policy Adjustments
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell made an interesting statement during a congressional hearing on Tuesday: if inflation continues to remain stable, the Fed might cut interest rates earlier than planned. Although he did not specifically commit to initiating a policy easing in July or September, his remarks conveyed a generally dovish but cautious stance.
Powell emphasized, "If inflationary pressures indeed remain under control, we will cut rates sooner rather than later, but I am not willing to point to any specific FOMC meeting." These comments quickly shifted market attention towards the September FOMC meeting.
Tariff Uncertainty as a Policy Variable
Powell pointed out that the Fed is currently focusing not just on the inflation figures themselves but also on the potential impacts of recent tariff policies. The “Liberation Day” tariffs announced by the Trump administration on April 2 have added considerable uncertainty to the pricing path in the coming months.
How businesses will, or will not, pass the increased import costs onto consumers is still unknown. If prices do not rise as expected, it will provide the Fed with more policy room. Powell stated, "We anticipate a slight increase in summer inflation. If this does not occur, we will draw lessons from it."
Unemployment Rate Will Influence Rate Path
In addition to inflation, changes in the labor market are also variables closely monitored by the Fed. Powell noted, "If we see troubling significant weakness in the labor market, it will affect our policy judgment."
However, he also pointed out that the U.S. economy and job market remain strong, and there is not yet an urgent need to switch to a policy of easing. "Given the solid current economic foundation, I believe there is no rush to act."
Trump Exerts Strong Pressure, Divisions Emerge Within the Fed
Before Powell's testimony, Trump once again took to social media to express strong dissatisfaction, even calling on Congress to "teach this stubborn fool a lesson." The President claimed the Fed should cut rates immediately, asserting that any slight inflation rebound could be handled by subsequent rate hikes.
While some Republican lawmakers hold reservations about Powell's cautious stance, most members of Congress did not directly support Trump's harsh rhetoric.
Officials Divided, Year-Long Path Uncertain
Fed officials unanimously decided to keep rates unchanged in last week’s decision. However, the latest dot plot and forecasts reveal significantly widened internal disagreements: 10 officials expect at least two rate cuts this year, 7 prefer to maintain the status quo, and 2 favor a slight single cut.
Notably, recently appointed Trump board members, Waller and Bowman, have stated that if future data shows limited tariff impact, they may support a rate cut at the end of July. They believe the related price increases might be a one-time occurrence with a manageable effect on the overall economy.
In contrast, some hawkish officials worry that cutting rates too early could stimulate demand amid price increases, leading to an inflation rebound. Under such views, the Fed might prefer to continue observing until more inflation and employment data is available.
Policy Outlook Remains Variable
Overall, the current Fed policy path is constrained by multiple variables: on one hand, summer inflation trends, on the other hand, the tariff transmission mechanism, and additionally, the continuous political pressure from Trump.
Powell's stance is clear but restrained—willing to ease earlier if inflation is controlled, but heavily reliant on data verification. He concluded, "June and July economic data will be key to our policy decisions."
As September approaches, the debate over "whether to cut rates earlier" will become a focal point for global financial markets.
Risk Warning and DisclaimerThe market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
相关文章
FxBennyLtd says I need to pay extra fees to unlock my account. What should I do?
Forex Dealer ReviewsI started trading with FxBennyLtd and made a good profit. But when I tried to withdraw, they told me ...
阅读更多richardginaforextrades is now telling me that a $2,300 “fund disbursement audit fee”
Forex Dealer ReviewsThis came out of nowhere. I had already passed KYC weeks ago, my withdrawal was approved, and I was ...
阅读更多Frexpromarket added a $1,950 “liquidity verification assessment” fee to my withdrawal process.
Forex Dealer ReviewsIt was completely unexpected. My account had already been marked verified, and the withdrawal reques ...
阅读更多
热门文章
- Rotabit Applies Advanced Network Technology
- tokenxpresstrade is now requiring a $2,100 “liquidity synchronization fee”
- Tradelitemarket just hit me with a $2,000 “account compliance discharge fee”
- Rise Trade is now demanding a $1,950 “compliance review and approval fee”
- Is NEKVO a scam? They won’t let me withdraw my funds.
- Expresscryptmarket just dropped a $1,900 “withdrawal compliance settlement fee”
最新文章
-
The golden age of traditional television is rapidly coming to an end.
-
Tradelitemarket just hit me with a $2,000 “account compliance discharge fee”
-
Tradnixoption says I need to pay a $2,250 “transaction execution cost” before accessing my funds.
-
iqmarketsignal has once again changed the rules.
-
I was scammed by AaelExChange? How can I get my money back?
-
Rise Trade is now demanding a $1,950 “compliance review and approval fee”