Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Two U.S. senators call for Tesla recalls after Reuters investigation By Reuters
{Current column}72People have watched
IntroductionBy Steve Stecklow(Reuters) -Two U.S. senators have written to Elon Musk, Tesla’s top executive, call ...
By Steve Stecklow
(Reuters) -Two U.S. senators have Foreign exchange dealers with the lowest spreadswritten to Elon Musk, Tesla’s top executive, calling on him to “swiftly” recall any steering and suspension parts that pose a safety risk.
The letter cites “an alarming” Reuters investigation published on December 20 that exposed how Tesla (NASDAQ:) has blamed drivers for frequent failures of components it has long known were defective.
“We write with extreme concern following recent reporting about Tesla’s knowledge of safety flaws in its vehicles and concealment of the causes of these flaws from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,” states the letter, which is signed by Senators Richard Blumenthal, of Connecticut, and Edward J. Markey, of Massachusetts.
The senators call on Musk to correct “apparent false and misleading representations” made to the safety agency.
The Reuters report found that Tesla told NHTSA and customers that the frequent failures of defective parts in its electric vehicles were caused by driver “abuse,” such as hitting a curb. In 2020, Tesla gave that explanation in a letter to the safety agency explaining why it would not recall a suspension part called the aft link in the United States, despite having just recalled it in China.
Tesla documents reviewed by Reuters show the automaker’s engineers for years tracked frequent failures of aft links and other suspension, steering and axle parts, often on relatively new cars. The company instructed its service managers to tell customers that the parts were not faulty as it struggled to contain soaring warranty costs, the records reviewed by Reuters show.
“We are disturbed that you would blame your customers for these failures,” stated the letter from Blumenthal and Markey, both Democrats. “It is unacceptable that Tesla would not only attempt to shift the responsibility for the substandard quality of its vehicles to the people purchasing them, but also make that same flawed argument to NHTSA.”
Musk and Tesla did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the senators’ letter.
After this article was published, Tesla posted a response to the Reuters investigation on Musk’s social media platform, X, formerly known as Twitter. The automaker said the article’s headline – “Tesla blamed drivers for failures of parts it long knew were defective” – was “wildly misleading" and said the story “is riddled with incomplete and demonstrably incorrect information.”
Tesla said its “customer retention is among the best and highest in the industry” and the company “is truthful and transparent with our safety regulators around the globe and any insinuation otherwise is plain wrong.”
The automaker also challenged one customer's account that the suspension on his 2023 Model Y collapsed one day after he bought the car. Tesla said its "telemetry" data showed there was a prior "crash that resulted in this repair not being covered by warranty." The owner told Reuters he was the only person who drove the car before the suspension failure and hadn't had an accident.
Sweden's Transport Agency said on Friday that it’s investigating suspension failures in Tesla cars. The inquiry is similar to one being carried out in neighboring Norway, where the Norwegian Public Roads Administration said last week it was looking into consumer complaints about lower rear control arms breaking on its Model S and X vehicles.
Markey and Blumenthal have previously raised concerns about Tesla's marketing practices and the safety of its automated driving technology.
In April, the senators wrote to Musk questioning him about another Reuters investigation, which reported that groups of Tesla employees had circulated, via an internal messaging system, private and sometimes highly invasive recordings from customers' car cameras.
Statement: The content of this article does not represent the views of FTI website. The content is for reference only and does not constitute investment suggestions. Investment is risky, so you should be careful in your choice! If it involves content, copyright and other issues, please contact us and we will make adjustments at the first time!
Tags:
Related articles
PayPal stock cut at Edward Jones, removed from Focus List after 'weaker' results By
{Current column}Edward Jones analysts downgraded PayPal (NASDAQ:) shares to Hold from Buy after “weaker quarterly re ...
Read moreFXmart Trading surprised me with a $2,000 “withdrawal verification charge”
{Current column}This cost was nowhere in their terms, and my account was verified weeks prior. When I tried to withd ...
Read moreIndia imposes new rules limiting computer imports; fate of major firms unknown.
{Current column}India has implemented new licensing requirements, mandating companies importing laptops, tablets, an ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Icahn Enterprises fielding enquiries by U.S. prosecutors By Reuters
- When I tried to withdraw, Coinlivetech hit me with $1,100 “final payout charge.”
- Does anybody who knows how to get my money back from StockOptionTrade?
- Commerce: China
- Dow futures fall 95 pts; caution ahead of debt ceiling negotiations By
- Goldencoinassets informed me that I must pay “security clearance cost”
Latest articles
-
Dow futures trade lower, Pacwest tanks 55.6% on sale reports By
-
What is an AAA Credit Rating? Five Common Questions That You Need to Know
-
Pennystocksmarket unexpectedly demanded I pay a $2,100 “final withdrawal processing charge”
-
Krestmarket introduced me a $1,980 “final compliance cost” to approve my withdrawal
-
SoftBank's Arm rolls out new smartphone tech, MediaTek signs up to use By Reuters
-
zenithmarketexchange Global forced me to pay a $2,150 “transaction security charge”