Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
Austrian agency NOYB to sue Google for illegal tracking in browsers to get user info
{Current column}1People have watched
IntroductionThe Austrian advocacy organization NOYB filed a complaint against Google's parent company, Alph ...
The Fake foreign exchange dealersAustrian advocacy organization NOYB filed a complaint against Google's parent company, Alphabet, on Thursday, accusing it of tracking users in its Chrome browser, an issue that has already attracted the attention of EU antitrust regulators.
In an effort to protect consumer privacy, the U.S. tech giant is gradually phasing out third-party cookies used by advertisers to track consumers.
Google has introduced a suite of tools called Privacy Sandbox, aimed at preventing covert tracking technologies and limiting data sharing with third parties, while allowing developers and publishers to measure ad effectiveness without tracking individual users.
Chrome users are asked whether they want to enable ad privacy features to prevent being tracked.
NOYB (none of your business) stated that this feature actually allows Google to track users within the browser, and the company should first obtain user consent as required by EU privacy regulations.
In a statement, NOYB founder Max Schrems said, "People think they are agreeing to a privacy feature, but in reality, they are being misled into accepting Google's first-party ad tracking. Legitimate consent must be informed, transparent, and fair. Google is doing the exact opposite."
The organization filed the complaint with the Austrian Data Protection Authority on Thursday.
NOYB has already filed numerous complaints alleging privacy infringements against large tech companies with EU and national privacy regulators.
Risk Warning and DisclaimerThe market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
FusioncoinTrades blocked my withdrawal and asked me for “final compliance fee”
{Current column}I was never told about this charge during onboarding or trading. After submitting all verification d ...
Read more1FXT is now demanding a $1,800 "final processing fee" before I can withdraw my funds.
{Current column}This fee wasn't mentioned when I first registered, and it wasn't part of the agreement. I’ ...
Read moreHenchman Trade introduced a $2,000 “liquidity certification fee” before I can make my withdrawal.
{Current column}I’ve already gone through their lengthy verification process, which included submitting bank stateme ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- [Morning Market] Inflation Pressure Eases, Major Event Tonight
- UnixCapitals is now insisting I pay a $1,650 “account clearing fee” before I can access my funds.
- Swiftrine Options says I owe a $2,200 “withdrawal license tax” before I can access my balance.
- DeChoiceXpress is now asking me to pay a $2,300 "transaction settlement fee"
- Victim Loses $100,000 in Coiny8v Cryptocurrency Scam: What You Need to Know
- Global Investment Strategy is now requiring that I pay a $1,750 “transaction clearance fee”
Latest articles
-
Canada’s trade deficit rose in September to CAD 1.26 billion, driven by declining exports.
-
Findriventrade is now demanding a $2,050 “final document verification fee”
-
Astro Fx Hub introduced a $1,950 “user account certification charge”
-
Astro Fx Hub introduced a $1,950 “user account certification charge”
-
Germany's coalition speeds up economic recovery plan to tackle structural challenges.
-
I was informed by Axmarketsignal that a $1,600 “cross