Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
US judge orders Elon Musk to testify in SEC's Twitter probe By Reuters
{Current column}17346People have watched
IntroductionBy Jody Godoy(Reuters) -A federal judge ordered Elon Musk to testify again in the U.S. Securities an ...
By Jody Godoy
(Reuters) -A federal judge ordered Elon Musk to testify again in the U.S. Securities and lcm foreign exchange dealerExchange Commission's probe of his $44 billion takeover of Twitter, giving the regulator and the billionaire a week to agree on a date and location for the interview.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler's order, issued on Saturday night, formalized a tentative ruling she made in December that sided with the regulator.
The SEC sued Musk in October to compel the Tesla (NASDAQ:) and SpaceX CEO to testify as part of an investigation into his 2022 purchase of Twitter, the social media giant that he subsequently renamed X. Musk refused to attend an interview in September that was part of the probe, the SEC said.
The agency is examining whether Musk followed the law when filing the required paperwork about his purchases of Twitter stock, and whether his statements in relation to the deal were misleading.
Musk fought the SEC's bid to interview him, saying it had already done so twice, and accused the regulator of harassment.
Beeler rejected that argument. The SEC had authority to issue the subpoena, which sought relevant information, she said in the ruling.
If the SEC and Musk cannot agree on a date and time for the interview, Beeler said she will hear from both sides and decide for them.
Friction between Musk and the SEC began when the regulator sued him after he tweeted "funding secured" in 2018 in reference to a possible plan to take Tesla private. To settle that case, Musk agreed that a Tesla lawyer would vet his tweets about the electric vehicle maker. The SEC sued him again in 2019 for allegedly breaching that provision.
Musk has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the agreement, saying it violates his constitutional right to free speech.
Statement: The content of this article does not represent the views of FTI website. The content is for reference only and does not constitute investment suggestions. Investment is risky, so you should be careful in your choice! If it involves content, copyright and other issues, please contact us and we will make adjustments at the first time!
Tags:
Related articles
Meet Juan Merchan, the judge presiding over Trump's criminal case By Reuters
{Current column}By Tom Hals(Reuters) - When Donald Trump walks into Justice Juan Merchan's courtroom on Tuesday to f ...
Read moreIs Mercados G a legit or a scam? Mercados G Review
{Current column}FTI's top 100 forex brokers you can refer to for selection. If it is not in the top 100, you sho ...
Read moreIs TradeCentrum a legit or a scam? TradeCentrum Review
{Current column}FTI's top 100 forex brokers you can refer to for selection. If it is not in the top 100, you sho ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Central Europe's policymakers double down on hawkish message By Reuters
- Is EForexMarkets a legit or a scam? EForexMarkets Review
- Is HititFX a legit or a scam? HititFX Review
- Is STPFX a legit or a scam? STPFX Review
- Asian shares, US futures rise on debt ceiling deal By Reuters
- Is EForexMarkets a legit or a scam? EForexMarkets Review