Your current location is:{Current column} >>Text
SEC's ETF Deadline Signals 2024 Crypto Shift
{Current column}73People have watched
IntroductionThe U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has set a year-end deadline for final changes to a ...
The Aihua foreign exchange mt4app DownloadU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has set a year-end deadline for final changes to applications for several proposed exchange-traded funds (ETFs) tied to spot bitcoin. The SEC, in a key meeting with major financial firms like BlackRock, Grayscale Investments, ARK Investments, and 21 Shares, indicated a potential green light for these ETFs in early 2024. This move marks a significant shift in the SEC's approach, influenced by a recent federal appeals court decision favoring Grayscale's ETF proposal.
Key points include the SEC's intensified interaction with issuers ahead of a January 10 decision on a joint proposal by ARK-21 Shares, with technical tweaks and fee disclosures being the focus. The SEC has set December 29 as the deadline for final updates, essential for early approvals. The meeting also involved representatives from Nasdaq and Cboe, where the ETFs might be listed.
Looking ahead, issuers' compliance with SEC demands by year-end is crucial for early launches. Regulatory approval could be a watershed moment for Bitcoin and the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem, as investors brace for increased volatility and potential price swings in the Bitcoin market.
The SEC's openness to spot bitcoin ETFs represents a turning point for the cryptocurrency market, which has long sought mainstream financial products linked directly to bitcoin. The decisions, expected in early 2024, are eagerly awaited by the cryptocurrency community and financial markets.
Issuers are making technical adjustments to their filings, including provisions for cash redemptions as required by the SEC. Details on fees and initial seeding capital for the ETFs are also anticipated in the final updates, with ARK and 21 Shares proposing a 0.80% fee for their joint ETF. The initial seeding amounts are expected to be modest but will likely grow as trading begins, providing necessary liquidity for market makers
Risk Warning and DisclaimerThe market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.
Tags:
Related articles
The Mexican peso edged higher: Optimism following the release of inflation data boosts the peso.
{Current column}Mexican Peso Rises After Inflation Data Release:On Tuesday, the Mexican Peso (MXN) gained against ma ...
Read moreBAITE WEALTH demanded a $1,970 “cross
{Current column}That alone made no sense. I asked them why this applied, and they just repeated, “It’s part of the s ...
Read moreTM9 abruptly introduced a $1,880 “security clearance surcharge”
{Current column}There was no prior mention of this expense in any documentation or their website. I complied fully w ...
Read more
Popular Articles
- Oil giants fear Middle East conflict, expect rising demand, adding energy transition pressure.
- Indices Promarket suddenly slapped me with a $1,630 “compliance release coordination fee”
- FXprofinance refused to release my funds unless I pay a $2,250 “exit
- BAITE WEALTH demanded a $1,970 “cross
- “liquidity verification fee”? BitStockTrades surprised me by introducing this?
- FuryTrades suddenly demanded a $1,970 “final approval fee” before releasing my withdrawal
Latest articles
-
Jiangsu and Zhejiang Bank leads A
-
Just as I tried to withdraw, gnexus4 demanded a “regulatory confirmation fee”
-
ApexTred blocked my payout and demanded a $2,100 “compliance assurance fee”
-
Foster Traffic is insisting I pay a $2,050 “liquidity release fee” before granting my withdrawal.
-
Iran may attack Israel, raising Middle East tensions and oil price fluctuations.
-
I was surprised that Viciation demanded a “transaction review fee” without prior communication.